Ta ta!!

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
spider
Posts: 2384
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Ta ta!!

Post by spider »



one eyed jack
Posts: 12410
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Location: London
Contact:

Re: Ta ta!!

Post by one eyed jack »

Eat yer heart out Public Enemy! !laugh!

www.realcouples.com
www.onemanbanned.com
www.linkmojo.me/realcouples
www.twitter.com/realcouples
www.facebook.com/realcouples
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Ta ta!!

Post by Sam Slater »

Drama queen.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Some examples Cunty...

Post by Sam Slater »

[quote]After I posted this last year Sam Slater apologised for calling me a "thick cunt". I wasn't offended as I've said, just disappointed as it means the debate doesn't move forward if people continue to 'play the man rather than play the ball'.[/quote]

I'd argue that the debate doesn't move forward when people continue to be thick cunts.

Not saying your are, Max...........just putting it out there that there is more than one way of stalling a debate.

At least I'm willing to apologise - unlike some.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
fatmick
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Some examples Cunty...

Post by fatmick »

Sam sometimes I wish there was a facebook style "like" button on here!
max_tranmere
Posts: 4734
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Sam Slater

Post by max_tranmere »

"At least I'm willing to apologise - unlike some."

It was good of you to apologise when you did, although it was unnecessary. As I've said it would take a lot more than you and others being rude to offend me. I enjoy the debates on here and if people think someone is talking rubbish they can politely tell them, there's no need for someone to personally attack the poster. It suggests they are not articulate enough to tell the person how their argument is wrong and therefore have to attack them personally - 'playing the man rather than playing the ball', as I've said. Was considerate of you to apologise though, most others on here who are rude would never even consider doing something like that.
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Sam Slater

Post by Sam Slater »

[quote]It was good of you to apologise when you did, although it was unnecessary.[/quote]

It was right I apologised so I did.

I'm sometimes right and sometimes wrong. I'll sometimes be rude. What I won't do is let my pride get in the way of saying sorry - unlike some.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
fatmick
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Sam Slater

Post by fatmick »

That will have sailed way over the recipient's head!
David Johnson
Posts: 7844
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Fatmick

Post by David Johnson »

Oh Mick or Mick. Do you really, really think I don't know who Samuel is referring to?

Surely not, Mick?
Locked