All sounds bloody good to me! !grin!
The filthy volume features 112 pages filled with pictures ? and contains NO accompanying words.
Prudes!
Lady McCartney hardcore set?
Re: Lady McCartney hardcore set?
Like when Labour MP Diane Abbot recently said that 'lad mags' like FHM, Nuts, Maxim et al contain "disturbing hardcore pornographic images", while calling for them to be banned or at least put out of the reach of kids in newsagents.
If she wants to see what "hard core" really is then she should see some of my DVDs! !grin!
If she wants to see what "hard core" really is then she should see some of my DVDs! !grin!
Re: Lady McCartney hardcore set?
explains why she permanently loooks like shes sucking on a lemon tho....prob dreading this emerging.
mmm Alex Kramer
Re: Lady McCartney hardcore set?
Stella
*Pants like a dog* !grin!
*Pants like a dog* !grin!
Re: Lady McCartney hardcore set?
Bigoldowl wrote:
> Yet another one of these "sensational stories" by this
> cretinous rag. They've just use a preselected series of words
> when describing anything to do with porn. We have here the
> usual selection; "depraved" and "lurid" are just two examples
> that the "showbiz editor" has delved from the Sun's tawdry
> lexicon.
>
> They've used the other tried and tested formula which is: "too
> explicit to print in a family(?) newspaper". Then in the next
> paragraph print, in explicit detail, all the acts performed.
> This is done with a sniggering-nudge-nudge-wink-wink attitude
> which you'd expect to find from a fourth-former in a 1960's
> boarding school.
>
> Anyone with a modicum of understanding realises that this
> "story" represents, yet again, the height of rancid hypocrisy
> by this stinking hyprocritical vomit inducing rag!!!
>
> What makes me angry is why to people buy it? !furious!
>
>
Yep, 'deparaved' and 'lurid' are good circulation boosters. The Sun aren't stupid ... those words are like that little red triangle Channel 4 experimented with some years back, rags to a bull, so to speak.
> Yet another one of these "sensational stories" by this
> cretinous rag. They've just use a preselected series of words
> when describing anything to do with porn. We have here the
> usual selection; "depraved" and "lurid" are just two examples
> that the "showbiz editor" has delved from the Sun's tawdry
> lexicon.
>
> They've used the other tried and tested formula which is: "too
> explicit to print in a family(?) newspaper". Then in the next
> paragraph print, in explicit detail, all the acts performed.
> This is done with a sniggering-nudge-nudge-wink-wink attitude
> which you'd expect to find from a fourth-former in a 1960's
> boarding school.
>
> Anyone with a modicum of understanding realises that this
> "story" represents, yet again, the height of rancid hypocrisy
> by this stinking hyprocritical vomit inducing rag!!!
>
> What makes me angry is why to people buy it? !furious!
>
>
Yep, 'deparaved' and 'lurid' are good circulation boosters. The Sun aren't stupid ... those words are like that little red triangle Channel 4 experimented with some years back, rags to a bull, so to speak.
-
mrmcfister
- Posts: 1672
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lady McCartney hardcore set?
Folks..the Sun is out to make money.It has no scruples..dont get knickers in a twist..it drives every thing they print.There are no things it wont do ..unless it thinks it would lose sales as a result.'Mrs Mc. earned a few quid many years ago doing a bit a nude modelling'...that wont sell as much as 'hardcore porn shock' would it?