Lady McCartney hardcore set?

[Alex]

Anyone seen this "The Joys of Love" book?

[staceyowenfan]

It said in the aforementioned rag this morning that it was a "hardcore" set,,, wonders never cease

[Flat_Eric]

staceyowenfan wrote:

>>

I often think that a lot of people don't even know what "hardcore" really means.

Like when Labour MP Diane Abbot recently said that 'lad mags' like FHM, Nuts, Maxim et al contain "disturbing hardcore pornographic images", while calling for them to be banned or at least put out of the reach of kids in newsagents.

I haven't seen this particular book, but my guess (having seen other German publications with similar titles) would be that it's nothing more than softcore, simulated stuff taken with a soft-focus lens and nothing to get too excited about - if indeed it's even the gold-digger herself.

[Steve R]

The photos appear to leave little doubt that it is her.

She hasn't a leg to stand on.

[Alex]

..and a ladyshave for the other leg...

[lukeolson]

Why is it everytime a tabloid mentions porn, the word 'shame' is always used?

fucking elitist assholes, Page 3 is tasteful, yet porn is shameful

[Robches]

The Sun really is a rag. It's fairly well known she used to do some glamour work. So what? The article was ridiculous, it sounds as if it was written by the Archbishop of Canterbury in the 1950's, not by some hackette on the sleaziest rag in Fleet Street.

Heather McCartney might be a manipulative bitch, but anyone who holds this against her is a tosser, and Scum journos are hypocritical asswipes.