ANDREA SPINKS
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
I thought she now worked as an exxxxt
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
It's just I've seen lots of videos where she's interviewed and she has said she was gay.
-
pagangod_uk
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
)spider wrote:
> It's just I've seen lots of videos where she's interviewed and
> she has said she was gay.
Yeah gay alright, gay for PAY Lol!!
PG !happy!
> It's just I've seen lots of videos where she's interviewed and
> she has said she was gay.
Yeah gay alright, gay for PAY Lol!!
PG !happy!
-
planeterotica
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
She is well into some lezzy action in my Nadia post on this forum, Oh dear will i now be getting a letter from her lawyer !wink!
-
paul markham
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
All I can say is she wasn't gay when I shot her in 1997. She did have a fantasy about girls but definitely was into guys in a big way.
Retired.
On Skype sometimes @ paulmarkham1
On Skype sometimes @ paulmarkham1
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
@planeterotica and the rest of you guys be carefull she does have a rather weird interpretation of the law here's some excerpts from the threatening emails to the old aka forum
" You and your organisation must CEASE & DESIST all threads, publication of photos, links, and/or discussion relating to Andrea Spinks. Failure to comply will result in legal action against you."
Now if i lived in Russia 50 years ago and i got a letter like this from a certain "Uncle Joe" i would take it very seriously. But seriosly cmon!
They seem to think discussing her is a crime
"You are entirely responsible for loss of earnings, reputation and
defamation of character of our client/s personal image/images and
work by promoting a web location citing personal data, comment,
images, links to stolen material and therefore denying our clients
the opportunity of both privacy and/or remuneration."
She owned no copyright to any of the material on that site so bullshit "loss of earnings"."Defamation"! people commenting on pix and videos she had willingly consented to is defamation OH yeah!
"You are damaging our client's ability to earn a living."
Interesting one this so less of her porn material online and she could what, have charged more than ?500 an hour for her uh.. personal services somewhat counterintuitive
"You do not have any authorisation by our clients to use any materials
on your site."
She don't own it so more nonsense
"The very existence of your site is personally and financially
damaging to our clients."
Not quite sure about the logic for that
"This will take the form of High Court action and all information will
be open to the free press, worldwide, for comment."
Wow so in order to protect her reputation, fight defamation and guard her privacy all her porn material, and presumably tax returns for all her sources of income in the sex industry would be made available
Absolute farce one polite email from her to Methos would have closed the site
Usual story new boyfriend says i love you darling and don't give a damn about your past then writes this sort of nonsence
Cest la vie
" You and your organisation must CEASE & DESIST all threads, publication of photos, links, and/or discussion relating to Andrea Spinks. Failure to comply will result in legal action against you."
Now if i lived in Russia 50 years ago and i got a letter like this from a certain "Uncle Joe" i would take it very seriously. But seriosly cmon!
They seem to think discussing her is a crime
"You are entirely responsible for loss of earnings, reputation and
defamation of character of our client/s personal image/images and
work by promoting a web location citing personal data, comment,
images, links to stolen material and therefore denying our clients
the opportunity of both privacy and/or remuneration."
She owned no copyright to any of the material on that site so bullshit "loss of earnings"."Defamation"! people commenting on pix and videos she had willingly consented to is defamation OH yeah!
"You are damaging our client's ability to earn a living."
Interesting one this so less of her porn material online and she could what, have charged more than ?500 an hour for her uh.. personal services somewhat counterintuitive
"You do not have any authorisation by our clients to use any materials
on your site."
She don't own it so more nonsense
"The very existence of your site is personally and financially
damaging to our clients."
Not quite sure about the logic for that
"This will take the form of High Court action and all information will
be open to the free press, worldwide, for comment."
Wow so in order to protect her reputation, fight defamation and guard her privacy all her porn material, and presumably tax returns for all her sources of income in the sex industry would be made available
Absolute farce one polite email from her to Methos would have closed the site
Usual story new boyfriend says i love you darling and don't give a damn about your past then writes this sort of nonsence
Cest la vie
-
paul markham
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
Would be very interesting if I got a letter like that.
Could use it to wipe my ass with. LOL
Could use it to wipe my ass with. LOL
Retired.
On Skype sometimes @ paulmarkham1
On Skype sometimes @ paulmarkham1
Re: ANDREA SPINKS
I hope it's on soft paper then.