egafd.com

I might be able to explain why some models charge more if their work is never going to be published. Some younger models may see what they do in this area as a career and factor that into the equation too. I admit I'm guessing but it must be one thing to spend all day in Joe Schmoe's dingy back ...

I'm a professional photographer who lurks on this forum, once in a while, in the hope of finding an interesting model or two. I don't really shoot adult content, more like soft-core, but I expect to pay at least ?100 per hour. I'm in London though and I'm genuinely surprised to see how inexpensively ...

I thought it was dull and half empty. If I'd had to pay, I certainly wouldn't pay 35 quid for the chance of meeting a few glamour models.

Regarding allowing your model to use the room and travel back the next day, there is a downside to this. I did it once and as I left the hotel I noticed a couple of my models friends (who I also vaguely knew) turning up in their cars. For what, I believe, was some sort of party. Which, knowing her ...

Well not all Holiday Inns look like Holiday Inns any more either. There's one in North London that has a lot of very boring looking tiny rooms but just two rooms, at the front, that are large, with big windows and stunning balconies. And for exactly the same price as the tiny rooms. The other thing ...

I mainly lurk on here but this is completely wrong IMVHO. None of the masters of erotic photography ever, as far as I know, use/used sets and I guess there must be a reason for this. For many of them, hotel rooms were central. Helmut Newton, Guy Bordin, Bettina Rheims, Jeanloup Sieff, Roy Stuart ...

Hi Crystel

I've been trying to get in touch with you by both email and phone for over a week. When you get a chance, could you give me a call please.

(My phone number is on the last email you did respond to).

Thanks,

Derek.

Besides anything else, he doesn't appear to know what the adultxxx trade fair is actually called.

And if they were there, someone from here would certainly have bumped into them. The Brits always seem to stick out in the crowd over there and I presume they'd be trying to do plenty of networking?

I have a sneeky feeling this is her real name, so the lawyers may be wasting their time.

I must respectfully disagree with you Cenobitez. Sticking at 2.8 from a few feet, or few inches away, will obviously enable you to get something like nipples and piercings sharp and the rest of the body blurred. But those are really detail type photos and I don't thats what stormchild69 meant. F2.8 ...