XNK5559 = XNK6857

[Johray1]

Hi!

This hot young lady is featured twice on egafd; IMHO.





To ensure I mean the "right" girl I made some caps from the only scene I got featuring her.






-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hope these little details might help to ID her in the long run...
!cigar!

As she (IMHO) has some rather "eastern" look about her; She speaks flawless
german. She is so at ease with the german language that one might predict
she's been born and raised in GER, or at least moved there at an age still very young.


---------------------------

Something that came to my attention as well:
There is one (unintended) brief interruption in the scene when a male voice speaks to the girl
very strictly... "Nimm mal seine Hand da weg" =
Most-likely the director and this voice sounds familiar; like "Twawer" (IMHO) who
can be heard in a lot of his films due to poor editing..
But, of course... She isn't called any name in the scene..
!sad!

[jj]

I can certainly see a strong similarity - the pussy-rings, the small tits, the
teeth and nose. So I'm more than half-convinced...... maybe having her hair
down is misleading me. In 5559 I can see what look like moles, one on each
cheek in identical positions:
.

I'll try and see if I can spot these in 6857...... meanwhile, I've added some
more caps to 5559's gallery.

[Johray1]

Hi JJ!

You are absolutely right about the moles.
I tend to believe this is a matter of "Make up" & "Age"
To a certain extent.
I've been told moles might grow without indicating
trouble, as they simply might as well not grow...
And yes, she's got such a small, thin face...
Hair can "change" people anyway...

Thanks for having a go at it! !thumbsup!

--------------------

PS: The "mean" thing is that I am so into all this that I (sometimes) can't hold back.
Whatever I post and believe to be "important" it's never meant to cause "Trouble"..
I don't want to be taken as rude or careless; I am not. Not really...
I have to learn to adjust to a certain limit that is yet quite hazy to me..
!blush!

[jj]

PS: The "mean" thing is that I am so into all this that I (sometimes) can't hold back.
Whatever I post and believe to be "important" it's never meant to cause "Trouble"..
I don't want to be taken as rude or careless; I am not. Not really...
I have to learn to adjust to a certain limit that is yet quite hazy to me..
!blush!

You're doing fine. You listen, and you don't get annoyed when I rant and rave.
You just caught us/me at a bad time.

[Johray1]

Looks like XNK6857
is Mandy! aka "Cher"
(At least IMHO)...

What about these?!

Egafd-listed film:
Der Mann aus dem Wald





And another one:
"Lutsch den Lolli"




Source:

[jj]

'Mandy' is the name I had pencilled in for her.... trouble is, all the websites
that give her that name don't seem to provide much if any source-material
to back up the assertion. Call me eccentric, but I like proof : -)

I can call myself 'Willy Wombat', but that don't necessarily make me a
fossorial Antipodean diprotodont with an endearing gait.

[Johray1]

>I can call myself 'Willy Wombat', but that don't necessarily make me a
fossorial Antipodean diprotodont with an endearing gait


-------------------

I see and without aiming contra; what exactly is proof?!
Even if a name is printed on a cover or DVD or tape...
Who can tell it's not a mistake or fantasy... etc....
There are a lot of things "common" that will leave you alright with just
the slightest hints of "proof"
Other things will always remain suspicious; depends upon various matters... I suppose.
At least that's how I reflect it in general....

[jj]

Johray1 wrote:
> I see and without aiming contra; what exactly is proof?!

Well, without getting too much into inappropriate epistemology... yes, we
are dealing with an area where there are strong disincentives for peeps
to be truthful and few overriding reasons for honesty. Given those limitations
we do the best we can with the internal rules we have set ourselves.
A poor choice of word on my part: 'credible corroboration' might have been
better. Be thankful that egafd - unlike some other places - refuses the [often
strong] temptation just to slap any old name on any old girl, just because
they could probably get away with it : -)

[marcel_43]

For example, a proof would be the on screen (or cover) credits of "Lutsch den Lolli" and "Der Mann aus dem Wald".

If both titles feature the name "Mandy" it would be likely that this AKA refers to XNK6857 (or Kimberly, who appears in both titles as well).

It looks like the info for both films came from HeinBollo's posts at the VEF. I mentioned before that he's a knowledgeable guy but also wrote that one should be careful with his ID's.

For instance, he mentions that Tina Blum appears in "Lutsch den Lolli" which is simply wrong. The actress in the first scene together with XNK6857 is actually XNK1477/Gina.

As it looks, XNK6857 was present in titles around 1996/1997 while XNK5559's "Piss mir in den Mund!" is from 2000. I saw the latter movie some time ago and if I compare XNK5559 to the gallery pictures of XNK6857 I'm not convinced they are the same person.

Finally, I'd like to ask a question: Is there any source for the name "Mandy"?

[jj]

Thanks, marcel, for concisely outlining the position.

'Mandy': I believe I saw it used in connection with 5559 on VEF. But there
didn't seem to be any corroboration so I merely made a note of the possibility.
I, too, noticed the chronologcal discrepancy - another reason why I was unwilling
to merge these XNKs.