If they keep developing their nuclear technology then I can see it happening. I can't see how the USA will let the Ayatollah in Iran develop nuclear warheads. I can't see how Russia will be comfortable with it either.
I hope not though.
Iran
-
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
-
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
DavidS wrote:
> Totally endorse your view regarding BBC news, Keith. Mind you
> if you think their national news is bad, try watching some of
> their terrible local news programmes. Channel 4 news is the
> best on tv by some way.
Agree - Channel 4 news and More 4 news are excellent. The BBC is impartial about most things EXCEPT British foreign policy.
> Totally endorse your view regarding BBC news, Keith. Mind you
> if you think their national news is bad, try watching some of
> their terrible local news programmes. Channel 4 news is the
> best on tv by some way.
Agree - Channel 4 news and More 4 news are excellent. The BBC is impartial about most things EXCEPT British foreign policy.
[url=http://www.strictlybroadband.com/]Strictly Broadband[/url]: new movies published daily, 365 days a year!
-
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
Sam Slater wrote:
> If they keep developing their nuclear technology then I can see
> it happening. I can't see how the USA will let the Ayatollah in
> Iran develop nuclear warheads.
Sam, Iran is actually one of the most democratic regimes in the region. The Ayatollah does have too much power, but it is shared with an elected parliament.
This is NOTHING to do with nuclear power/weapons any more than Iraq was about WMD. Don't let yourself get taken in by the propaganda - the American right has wanted war with Iran for 28 years, and they're fishing for excuses.
> If they keep developing their nuclear technology then I can see
> it happening. I can't see how the USA will let the Ayatollah in
> Iran develop nuclear warheads.
Sam, Iran is actually one of the most democratic regimes in the region. The Ayatollah does have too much power, but it is shared with an elected parliament.
This is NOTHING to do with nuclear power/weapons any more than Iraq was about WMD. Don't let yourself get taken in by the propaganda - the American right has wanted war with Iran for 28 years, and they're fishing for excuses.
[url=http://www.strictlybroadband.com/]Strictly Broadband[/url]: new movies published daily, 365 days a year!
-
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
The BBC "impartial"? I, and many other free thinkers, would beg to differ. The BBC is rabidly PC, pro European, pro immigration and pro Palestinian. But anti-American, Anti Semitic and anti-business.
Officer Dibble
Officer Dibble
-
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
"I don't usually watch the BBC news as it is pretty superficial"
Are you just talking about the 6.00 PM News, or do you also mean the 'Newsnight' 'This Week' and 'Today' programs? I must say, Jeremy Paxman has never struck me as being "superficial".
Officer Dibble
Are you just talking about the 6.00 PM News, or do you also mean the 'Newsnight' 'This Week' and 'Today' programs? I must say, Jeremy Paxman has never struck me as being "superficial".
Officer Dibble
-
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Iran
Oh, you mean Kirsty Wark? I don?t have much of a view on her interviewing abilities one way or another. But I?ll tell yer what, she one of my fantasy shags! Yes, I love those mature, plain, intellectual types. I find that behind that prim and proper veneer they?re usually passionate, raving, nymphos, and far more rewarding than yer empty-headed chavettes who are, sadly, nowadays, to dim to even put any makeup or sexy clobber on. Hey, I?ll tell yer what, once Kirsty steps out from behind that desk she?s a fine figure of a woman. I always look forward to seeing her ?out and about? arts programs.
Officer Dibble
Officer Dibble