the london underground
the london underground
its good but annoying that some trains dont go all the way through re today the central line got on at tottenham ct rd-queensway but had to change at marble arch.
Re: the london underground
Really! wow, I would complain in the strongest terms Steve, the problrm is who to complain to.
[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.
-
Sam Slater
- Posts: 11624
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: the london underground
Probably line work maybe? Like roads, there has to be disruption sometimes, though just before Christmas seems a little silly. Maybe it was someting that came up unexpectedly and couldn't wait?
Always found the tube reliable and easy to use. At least you're out of the rain while waiting and you're less likely to be mugged underground than overground.
Always found the tube reliable and easy to use. At least you're out of the rain while waiting and you're less likely to be mugged underground than overground.
[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Re: the london underground
where i live i have the choice of paddington, royal oak,bayswater,queensway,lancaster gate to choose from.
-
Bob Singleton
- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: the london underground
steve56 wrote:
> red ken.
Why him?
His hands were pretty much tied by the Government signing PPP initiatives with contractors prior to the first mayoral elections, which mean that certain companies have long-term contracts to provide and/or maintain the infrastructure and/or rolling stock with almost non-existant penalty clauses if they don't do their jobs properly... not unlike the national rail system!
Sometimes tubes only do a part journey because they need to return from whence they came so as to provide greater capacity a little later in the day in an area where they would provide the most benefit, rather than being at the far end of a line running in the "wrong" direction to where they are most needed.
> red ken.
Why him?
His hands were pretty much tied by the Government signing PPP initiatives with contractors prior to the first mayoral elections, which mean that certain companies have long-term contracts to provide and/or maintain the infrastructure and/or rolling stock with almost non-existant penalty clauses if they don't do their jobs properly... not unlike the national rail system!
Sometimes tubes only do a part journey because they need to return from whence they came so as to provide greater capacity a little later in the day in an area where they would provide the most benefit, rather than being at the far end of a line running in the "wrong" direction to where they are most needed.
"But how to make Liverpool economically prosperous? If only there was some way for Liverpudlians to profit from going on and on about the past in a whiny voice."
- Stewart Lee
- Stewart Lee
-
strictlybroadband
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: the london underground
steve56 wrote:
> red ken.
Yeah, all his fault. Plus you should blame asylum seekers and single mums.
I could be a Daily Express columnist.
> red ken.
Yeah, all his fault. Plus you should blame asylum seekers and single mums.
I could be a Daily Express columnist.
[url=http://www.strictlybroadband.com/]Strictly Broadband[/url]: new movies published daily, 365 days a year!
-
planeterotica
- Posts: 7093
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: the london underground
You get a lot of jumpers this time of year who cant face Christmas, it takes hours to remove the body from beneath the train they have no consideration for other people, there should be a law against it !xmas!!xmas!!xmas!
Re: the london underground
Nothing that makes your snot black is good.
Re: the london underground
Have you tried Bolivian,s finest?
[_]> No Liberals were harmed during the making of this post.