Big Brother Talks

[eroticartist]

Subjects in Middlesborough are taking part in another state experiment in behaviour control. CCTV cameras are not only watching,zooming in and out, picking up the audio with digital zoom mikes are now barking commands to startled pedestrians.

The authoritarian mind is born of paranoia the fear that the proles will rise up and march on Downing Street ,baying for their blood.
Control freaks like Big Brother always want to be despots, to exploit and control your body. They in the Home Office that people will be conditioned to obey. Once that is achieved they can begin to modify social behaviour.
"Disperse and go home. You have all been fined?100. " Facial recognition software will identify everyone. the soft police of "social workers" will prepare reports.

Instead of ritualising "anti social violence and boozing by televising it and broadcasting it to the people the authoritarian mind tries to control it. They the paragons of virtue look snootily down their PC noses at the behaviour
of the common people. There has always been the rites of youth in every culture to demonstrate their inherent fighting spirit to admiring young girls. Both are looking for mates, the fighters and the females. In a pub fight the challege would be "come outside for a straightener."
In the Fifties the Teddy boys were demonised. Sure there were plenty of gang fights but hardly anyone was killed or even badly injured. I remember all my mates sticking plasters down their cut-throat razors so they would not go too deep.

Big Brother never learns as Orwell knew to well, because as a public schoolboy he understood the mind of the ruling class. After all he planned to be on the winning side. He knew that despots,priests or politicians will end up dying a sudden and violent death. The people and their children are becoming ill, depressed and this leads to violence.
MikeFreeman

[Officer Dibble]

"They the paragons of virtue look snootily down their PC noses at the behaviour of the common people"

Yeah, the freakin' PC knobheads. They?ve always been contemptuous of us no-nonsense proles. But it looks like you've got their number, Mike - seems you've rumbled 'em. No flies on you.... So, how do you propose we deal with 'em?


?Orwell knew to well, because as a public schoolboy he understood the mind of the ruling class.?

Oh, so Orwell knew that they were nuts as well?... Hmmm, he was obviously a man of some insight and perception. My estimation of him is increasing exponentially.



Officer Dibble

[eroticartist]

Dibble,
You ought to read 1984.
Mike.

[eroticartist]

Hi Mucho,
you are right about the biometric information the state is collecting on all of us. Fact: we have more CCTV cameras in this country than the rest of the world put together! We are sliding down the slippery slope of authoritarianism at an alarming rate. Democracy is a farce in this country.
Mike.

[Jacques]

eroticartist wrote:

> We are
> sliding down the slippery slope of authoritarianism at an
> alarming rate.

So very true. We are being criminalised at every opportunity, 3000 new criminal offences in 10 years which is almost a new criminal offence every day created by this government. OK some were and are necessary but were all 3000?

The free man is harder to control than the criminal. Criminalize everyone and you have authoritarianism.

[eroticartist]

Jacques,

Lots of people break the law every day, that jazz cigarette or giving young Johnny a smack,riding on the pavement,not having a proper seat for your child in the car. Let us face it most people can be nicked and the police have powers to enter anyone's house anytime they want, soon to look for pictures of adults engaging in consensual SM activities! Everyone is a potential criminal.

Is crime less now than before these 3000 new offences were committed? No,the conclusion is none of these new laws were really needed.

Mike.

[Jacques]

Mike

You may well be correct, but it's another 3000 offences that they can control you with if they so desire. And that is my point we have all been criminalized to such an extent that soon everything we do will be illegal unless 'Government Approved'.

Of course conversely if you make this many things illegal it has to be policed which requires money and manpower and this is where I think the Violent Porn Bill will fail, just like current statistics show, as you point out, nothing has changed. There is something like 3 or 4 million people into S&M who almost certainly have pics/video of their chosen sexual practice. How do you police that many people and imprison them for 3 years? And then there are all the other created offences.

I really think the Lib-Dems have the right idea with their Repeal Act.

Of course if we get the Legaslative and Regulatory Reform Bill.....well I shall be doing what you are currently in the process of and leaving the country.

(And good luck to you by the way, I hope the move goes well)

[eroticartist]

Jacques,

And do not forget they the legislators and their ilk are mostly solicitors and they and their friends will earn loads of money out of defending and prosecuting the "criminal "public.

Paradoxically, it is the public who pay for all these "services." The whole "justice" system,including the prisons are a huge money spinner with privatised companies running the prisons and escorting prisoners to court.
The legal profession becomes rich and that means themselves,so the more laws the better from their point of view.

One out of three males has already been prosecuted for some offence or other and this country imprisons more people per capita than any other European country.

I wonder just how many of the 3000 laws enacted by this government the Lib Dems would actually repeal if they found enough millionaires to support them.

With all this cheap labour flooding into the country there are plenty of cheap houses in Europe now.

Mike.

[Officer Dibble]

I have, Mike - on a number of occasions (haven?t I made you aware of this before?). Anyhow, I've got the DVD as well (though, sadly, not the T-shirt). I like the bit where Winston takes his bird, Julia, to the countryside to get away from the nightmare of political correctness (or ?newspeak? and ?doublethink? as Orwell referred to it). Julia is a class bird ? so, unlike today?s chav birds, I?d wager she had a right minge box on her. Small wonder then that Winston should presently ?get the lob on? and shag Julia In a leafy dell?Wheyhey! What a chap! What a party member!

Anyhow, what?s your favourite bit, Mike? Do you reckon O?Brien sent Winston to Room 101 ?cause in reality he was miffed at Winston showing a bit too much individuality and class in availing himself of Julia?s magnificent muff? Would this have been considered a crime against Ingsoc and Big Brother? Maybe O?Brien and the rest of the party had to make do with skanky dystopian chav birds, with minimal tit and ass (never mind a decent minge box). I can certainly see why they might have been pissed off about that.


Officer Dibble