[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/QK9Am.jpg[/IMG]
www.LucyAlexandra.com
Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
http://delectablydanimaye.blogspot.com/
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
Way to much photo shop done there they look like wax works
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
Absolutely! Its like a sex doll version of Danni!
I am sure that would sell well though lol
Two sexy girls and if there wasn't the faffing about with the picture I am sure it would be more popular
I am sure that would sell well though lol
Two sexy girls and if there wasn't the faffing about with the picture I am sure it would be more popular
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
Thought it was hentai lol.
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
[img]http://www.lucyalexandra.com/affiliate- ... 21test.jpg[/img]
This is interesting. How about this version? This is what it looked like straight from the camera (well, re-sized & watermarked).
I took the picture and did the photoshop.
I neither agree nor do I disagree with the comments, just take them on board. It?s interesting because I?ll put my hands up to ?over-photoshopping?. One of my webmaster mates is my greatest critic, tells me I should put a watermark on them and leave it at that.
What do you guys think? I?m genuinely interested. I?m on photographic and modelling forums but couldn?t ask them there, they?d have mass heart attacks if I put up images like these! I?d be banished to the badlands of the demonic adult photographer.
So although this thread wasn?t started seeking a critique, I think it could be useful for me to learn what some of you guys working in the industry and, not intending to be derogatory at all, what some punters think.
Is the first image wholly bad? Is the second image wholly better? I suppose since the frame and subject are identical we?re talking about the photoshopping. Is the best image somewhere between the two? By that I mean a more sympathetic ?photoshop?? Do you actually want any photoshopping at all, or prefer the pic unedited?
Opinions please, I have a stack of Dani Maye sets to edit over the next couple of weeks, maybe a bit of constructive criticism will assist in curbing my tendency to over-photoshop... God forbid I turn her into a sex doll!!
This is interesting. How about this version? This is what it looked like straight from the camera (well, re-sized & watermarked).
I took the picture and did the photoshop.
I neither agree nor do I disagree with the comments, just take them on board. It?s interesting because I?ll put my hands up to ?over-photoshopping?. One of my webmaster mates is my greatest critic, tells me I should put a watermark on them and leave it at that.
What do you guys think? I?m genuinely interested. I?m on photographic and modelling forums but couldn?t ask them there, they?d have mass heart attacks if I put up images like these! I?d be banished to the badlands of the demonic adult photographer.
So although this thread wasn?t started seeking a critique, I think it could be useful for me to learn what some of you guys working in the industry and, not intending to be derogatory at all, what some punters think.
Is the first image wholly bad? Is the second image wholly better? I suppose since the frame and subject are identical we?re talking about the photoshopping. Is the best image somewhere between the two? By that I mean a more sympathetic ?photoshop?? Do you actually want any photoshopping at all, or prefer the pic unedited?
Opinions please, I have a stack of Dani Maye sets to edit over the next couple of weeks, maybe a bit of constructive criticism will assist in curbing my tendency to over-photoshop... God forbid I turn her into a sex doll!!
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
Mark
Thats much better! The girls clearly dont need a lot of work at all.
To be honest the first photo you posted was OTT and detracted from the girls, the second is much much better. Some may argue for touches to be done here and there but I personally would say its a good photo of two cracking ladies. You take a good photo! Photoshop not so much
Keep up the god work though
Thats much better! The girls clearly dont need a lot of work at all.
To be honest the first photo you posted was OTT and detracted from the girls, the second is much much better. Some may argue for touches to be done here and there but I personally would say its a good photo of two cracking ladies. You take a good photo! Photoshop not so much
Keep up the god work though
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
http://delectablydanimaye.blogspot.com/
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
original pic looks ten times better than photo shopped one.
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/BqsIdl.jpg[/IMG]
http://delectablydanimaye.blogspot.com/
-
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Dani Maye & Lucy @ LucyAlexandra.com
http://delectablydanimaye.blogspot.com/