Fiona Cooper

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
Post Reply
davyboy
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Fiona Cooper

Post by davyboy »

Fiona Cooper, Chloe Cooper, Phil Sutcliffe what's the story and if it's just him running things from 'the mill' why parade as something else, I got the latest catalogue sent and I felt that all the letters were written from the same hand.
LIPS2MOUTH
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by LIPS2MOUTH »

hi,been buying vieos/dvds from Fiona Cooper since 1993.had no problems at all.fast delivery.
Fiona Cooper is suposed to be living in France and has some illness and now her daughter Chloe is suposed to running things.

not sure who this Phil Sutcliffe bloke is.although there is some old bloke who has his cock sucked by many of the girls.lucky sod.

bought all 3 Cate Harrington dvds but in a recent catalogue Chloe said Cate is "too up herself" and will not be filming her again.

i mean how the hell can you refuse Cate Harrington?
she is the sexiest,dirtiest new girl in uk porn.

i hope they change their minds and film more of her.
steve40
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by steve40 »

Fiona Cooper doesn't exist. It's all Phil and always has been. I suspect the letters you're reading are fake.
Robches
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by Robches »

LIPS2MOUTH wrote:

>
> not sure who this Phil Sutcliffe bloke is.although there is
> some old bloke who has his cock sucked by many of the
> girls.lucky sod.

That will be Mr Sutcliffe. Fiona Cooper and her daughter Chloe are figments of his imagination.
>
>
> i mean how the hell can you refuse Cate Harrington?
> she is the sexiest,dirtiest new girl in uk porn.

Maybe she doesn't like working with a man convicted of having sex with a 14 year old girl?

As you say, the business side of this operation works well. The films are as described, and arrive promptly when ordered, that side can't be faulted. But the bullshit about "Fiona" and her daughter really pisses me off. I can see the reason for it though, good marketing, but it doesn't work for me.

Trumpton
Posts: 7649
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by Trumpton »

Robches wrote:

> Maybe she doesn't like working with a man convicted of having
> sex with a 14 year old girl?

That maybe true of Ms. Harrington - but you will be surprised as to how many models, and their "agents", seem to forget that Sutcliffe IS on the Sex Offenders' Register and has been for some time now.
LIPS2MOUTH
Posts: 96
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by LIPS2MOUTH »

Not sure what to make of this Sutcliffe.
All cheques for orders have to made payable to Fiona Cooper and always have been.
There was Spirit dvds which was suposed to be a group that split from Fiona Cooper.
Maybe Cate Harrington knows what is going on there.

Its also strange how Lolly Badcock has never done a dvd for Fiona Cooper.
steve40
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by steve40 »

Fiona Cooper is a COMPANY NAME.
andy at handiwork
Posts: 4113
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by andy at handiwork »

So there really isn't a Mr Bluebird, or a Ms Killergram then? Who'd have thought it?
A-C
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Contact:

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by A-C »

Don't really get the confusion re the marketing stuff. 'Fiona Cooper' from a marketing perspective conjures the image of classy middle-class madam encouraging shrinking violets to shed their frillies. Gives more added value to the whole thing than the image of a bald bloke with a beer gut and a camcorder. Similarly, if Ann Summers was renamed Reg Gutbucket, I doubt it'd sell as many rabbit vibros.

steve40
Posts: 92
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Fiona Cooper

Post by steve40 »

and there's no longer a Mr. W. H. Smith either
Post Reply