Erotica:models required

[shaun22]

I have would looking to produce a series of stylish high quality erotic films primarily aimed at the couples matket. My feeling is that there is a real demand for films that are explicit ,erotic and loving and convey the beauty and sensuality of sex. Am asking for too much here? I don?t think so. It seems to me that mainstream producers make films which are certainly explicit but devoid of any feeling. Personally this does nothing for me. wouldnt it be great to see films with a credible story line feature natural attractive couples. I think two of best films I have seen are Candy Cottage and Harward Girls produced by Kojo Black. Very stylish and refreshing.change
I would very much like to hear from models who may be interested please include photo together with previous films and your current experience. Would also like to hear suggestions and ideas
Thanks

[Flash1]

Hi Shaun
post an email address to write to as there is not one on your profile or your posting.
Dougie

[Jayce Xaveri]

Hi Shaun
I have recently worked for Kojo Black, So i know what kind of film you are trying to go for...
But as Dougie has posted please put an email addy so i can contact you...
Or you can email me...
Jayce Xaveri

http://www.jayce-xaveri.co.uk

[R18 DVD Shop]

I think you are definately onto something - the best sellers on my site are the Anna Span movies which (rightly or wrongly as I havent watched them) are believed to be more couple friendly as they are made by a woman.

If I look back at the purchasing trends of female customers just about every time I get an order from a woman I can be sure its one of those titles before looking at the order contents and, almost without exception, they dont order any of the traditional perceived male orientated hardcore at all.

Jay

[nachovx]

That's how companies like Wicked, Vivid and Metro survive ... they produce bland couple friendly porn, full of metrosexual males and barbie doll girls. It's pretty bad from a male's perspective.

[Officer Dibble]

"It's pretty bad from a male's perspective"

Really? Hmmm. In what way? Could you be making unfounded presumptions about male sexuality, here? Could you be making assumptions regarding male sexual tastes that are based on nothing more than received wisdom? So, why is that kind of stuff bad for males and what is the basis of that view?

I?m interested in the phenomena of ?received wisdom? and why folks get certain ideas into their heads.


Officer Dibble

[one eyed jack]

I think Nachovx is speaking from his own perspective Officer and those who agree with him would agree on that perspective. Good porn is all subjective don't you think?

I think those companies represent a mainstream and do well for it because the buying public at large don't want anything too complicated like the acts of double anal, sweaty gapers and the like. I love the filthy stuff like that too but I don't expect a majority of people will take to it. It's like movies, food and anything else. People prefer less complicated otherwise they just don't get it and the people that do like more "complex" (harder) porn are more in the minority...That's my take on it. My perspective if you like.

[nachovx]

That genre of movie is usually made in the same way a soap opera is. A nice little story set in a big house or exotic location, soft focus and lots of flashbacks, misty dreams and one step removed from reality. You get to know the stars because you see them in every other movie as the contract star bandwagon rolls on ... that's what women like, continuity, stability and no shocks. The sort of movie that is slightly risqu?, but doesn't threaten or degrade them. They are xxx versions of Dallas or Bold & Beautiful, that's why women like them and most men don't. I'm not saying the sex scenes in them aren't good (sometimes), it's just all the schmaltz that surrounds them.

[Officer Dibble]

"Good porn is all subjective don't you think?"

Yes, Tel, subjective to the individual. But there are generalities in buying patterns and therefore, one assumes, tastes - e.g. most geezers like (real) big tits. It's just that there are these ideas and received wisdoms flying about out there, unchallenged, and without any evidential basis, as to what chaps in general want from porn.

Fer instance. One sometimes gets the feeling that there is a received wisdom amongst many on the forum that all guys want nothing more then to see "double anal, sweaty gapers" and all the baggage that goes with it. But that is simply not the case. I detest all that palaver. I find it boring, totally unerotic, and, in extremes cases, distasteful. I need real world sex, with real people (not the scraggy, contemporary, 21st century porn 'stars') in a real world context or scenario, to flick my switch. That's just my taste, but I do find that most of my punters seem to concur. I've tried all the sweaty gapers material, but there's not been much real interest in it.


Officer Dibble

[Officer Dibble]

"that's what women like, continuity, stability and no shocks. The sort of movie that is slightly risqu?, but doesn't threaten or degrade them"

So, are you suggesting that chaps, conversely, do like a movie that degrades them? If so, how have you come to that conclusion?

I've never felt like that. I would rather celebrate a beautiful, attractive woman, put her on a pedestal, if you like. But the key is that they've got to be worth celebrating to begin with ? so, no lairy, chavey, androgynous, scrubbers for me.

"Dallas"? Hey, now yer talking, I never missed an episode - all those fabulous women Linda Gray, Victoria Principal (they were proper women) and the like. Not to mention all the tasty motors and people living in the manner that I would love to become accustomed to. It was well cushty.



Officer Dibble