Livexxx versus Nine Songs

[Heathray]

Just a thought.........

Nine songs is passed as an 18 cert film, it shows cumshots, fellatio and full uncut penetration........

Livexxx, which seems to be the strongest of UK channels gets a man on tonights show and one of the girls (preferably Mackenzie Lee or Jane Whitehouse!) fucks him stupid and he explodes on her face and tits.

Have Livexxx done anything wrong seeing as I can see full on sex in my local cinema or buy the fim when it comes onto sale in HMV?

[Dace]

Yes - Heath, its an appalling double standard. But thats what the government is about, killing joy...

[Illinoisblue]

But Heathray, you're forgetting a very important fact; Nine Songs is art while Livexxx is nasty old porn.

[stewick]

Whats really funny is the difference between the two. Forgive me if this was wrong but I was once told by someone that the difference can be as till as erect nipples. If they are soft its being done as art and not for pleasure. If they are erect the women is getting pleasure and it is there for done to stimulate.

Better not do any performance art in a cold room or some people might think your making a porno!!

[Paul Tavener]

I have not seen the film myself but the BBFC have said that this film would probably not appeal to viewers of pornography. Not quite sure what they ment by that! (and I will reserve judgement) could it be that the actresses/actors are pig ugly or similar or perhaps its just BBFC talking nonsense?

I would be interested to see if nine songs gets a video release but fear it won't.

[Heathray]

I recall the great American frontman Dave Lee Roth defining the difference........

For titilation you use a few feathers, for porn you use the whole damn chicken!

This film really does beggar the question on who is guiding the censors, fucking is fucking whether it is Gonzo or a $5m semi mainstream film.

Maybe if the director had called it Art House Fuck Fest it would have got an R18 instead of general release....?