Likewise Private productions don't tickle my taste buds either these days, though I do admire the technical excellence of their productions and their commitment to source really glamorous attractive performs. Not that all performers need to look like Claudia Schiffer to make a stimulating movie. Well preserved middle-aged ladies can often be equally, if not more, sexually attractive. The key ingredient here is that they don't look contrived or pretentious - that they are not trying to conform to how they think the consumers think a porn performer should look like, i.e. skinny, plastic tits, tattoos, pricings, bald minge-box, crap unkempt hair style and no dress sense. Males in the real world find this kind of thing pretty unappealing in a girl.
I hope I'm not uncreative and unimaginative. I do try to inject a little more substance them just mechanical sex acts into my productions, giving the consumer a little more credit. The directors I admire most in the creative and quality sex field are Michael Ninn and Marc Dorcel and it is these I aspire to - time and budget permitting.
I'm sure they got up to all sorts of exciting stuff in those Romans orgies, which is great, it's just my contention that if 'cream-pies' and the like really were sexually exciting the Romans would have tried it and if it was any good it would have survived till today. I reckon a lot of those who champion cream-pies are simply trying to impress their peers. "Hey, look at me. I'm at the cutting edge of sex, I'm into 'cream-pies' I'm a real cool dude." As we have all done by buying the record that we didn't really like, wearing the gear that we now realise look stupid, smoking the ciggis, asking for a pint of John Smiths at 15 when we would have found a pint of lemonade much more palatable. Folks are full of shit, that's our nature.
Dibble.
P. S. I also have wondered what it is about stockings and suspenders that make a woman look so deliciously erotic. Haven't come to any kind of a conclusion yet.