o/t tracey shaw

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
magoo(in PO mode)

Re: o/t tracey shaw

Post by magoo(in PO mode) »

Can you send Lizard that pic and link re Victoria Huxley? She is far sexier than Jo Blythe

It will save me the effort.

Magoo.....A lazy cunt and no mistake
Ace

Re: o/t tracey shaw

Post by Ace »

Apologies to Magoo, its not often he's wrong about anything. I just saw an opportunity to pull him up. Two Days loss of remission
Elmer the Aylmer

Re: o/t tracey shaw - Martin Shaw is NOT Daddy!

Post by Elmer the Aylmer »

Ace wrote:
>
> Without going into Steve56 or Wink Wink mode, I didnt realise
> her Dad was that permed nosher from The Professionals, Martin
> Shaw. I suppose the surname is a bit of a giveaway!

Her Dad's name is Karl, and he's not 'in the bizness'
(Showbiz OR Porn)
steve56

Re: o/t tracey shaw - Martin Shaw is NOT Daddy!

Post by steve56 »

id already checked on imdb but never said anything before cos it pisses ace off.
jj

Re: o/t tracey shaw

Post by jj »

I was wondering why M should be in Post Office mode, or perhaps Pilot Officer mode.....Pissed-Off?
Sorry, time fer me pills.
jj

Re: o/t tracey shaw

Post by jj »

Sorry, already deleted.....I've only got 40 gigs, you know.
golostruda

Re: o/t tracy shaw

Post by golostruda »

Well this thread is hardly a good advert for the forum's collected poppular culture nous. Beginning with an allusion to Tracy Shaw's pubic hair when it's been all over the newspapers in recent weeks (since her The Blue Room debut) that she's got a 'shaven haven'. Then a bizarre claim that Martin Shaw is her dad because he has the same surname; by the same process, Suzanne Shaw, formerly of Hear'say, is her mum. Then half the board gives the wrong one from The Professionals the lead role in Who Dares Wins. And that's before we even begin considering how every post in this thread (except this one) has Tracy's name spelt wrong in the subject header. *tsk* Heaven help us if there's a war...
jj

Re: o/t tracy shaw

Post by jj »

I never mentioned her pubes, absent or otherwise (and was of course aware of the depilation).
I queried her alleged parentage.
I said nothing about the identites of Bogey and Boyle )but of course knew them).
I do not feel not responsible for the marginal alteration of a subject header.
I of course spelt her given name correctly in my post.

But I couldn't be bothered to correct all the above, because I'm not that pedantic........
golostruda

Re: o/t tracy shaw

Post by golostruda »

The first bracket in your third line is the wriong way round.
woodgnome

Re: o/t tracy shaw

Post by woodgnome »

am i "wroing" in assuming that you're currently kicking yourself? ;-)
Locked