Roough sex has no place in mainstream porn production.
If you want to shootit, treat as a fetishfor the die-hard mysogonist and women haters of thisd world.
When I see 3 guys on a poor teenage performer, who continiously slap her face and body, spit on her, gape her, buttfuck her, DP her, shove 4 fingers down her throat, and make her swallow all their enjaculations, my stomach just turns. Just sickening. This is porn?
Porn producers and distributors then even have the courage to declare that they shoot those scenes because the porn comsumer want, demand and pay for it, and the hell with the rest of the population. Well I would like to see Ron Jeremy and J. Deen treated the same way (for a change, just to even the playing field) and I bet a lot of other people would too, but is it going to happen?
Future of Porn
-
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Future of Porn
I got sucker punched as more than a few of the 36% were complaining recently they were no longer able to download complete seasons of TV every other day which they'd been doing up till the recent crackdowns on filehosts.
Just assumed limits were not in across the board
The backlash i was referring to was when there were no caps at all
I can see how the high end HD streaming would not go all that well with a limit of 150-300GB for a household.
Which is most likely why i limit myself to watching content in SD
most of the time.The HD site i mentioned is just a one off where i found some unseen vids of a few euro models.
I guess limits were always going to come in at some stage given
August 2012 Akamai: Global Average Broadband Speeds Up By 25%,
U.S. Up 29% To 6.7 Mbps
Just assumed limits were not in across the board
The backlash i was referring to was when there were no caps at all
I can see how the high end HD streaming would not go all that well with a limit of 150-300GB for a household.
Which is most likely why i limit myself to watching content in SD
most of the time.The HD site i mentioned is just a one off where i found some unseen vids of a few euro models.
I guess limits were always going to come in at some stage given
August 2012 Akamai: Global Average Broadband Speeds Up By 25%,
U.S. Up 29% To 6.7 Mbps
-
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Future of Porn
Makes sense
CDs/DVds were never indestructible as many of us found out when mal-functioning players scratched the shit out of them.
I suppose the enviroment where you store them is as important as the quality of the discs used.Direct sunlight or extreme heat never advised
I'm only going on bought cds/dvds versus burnt downloads
The burnt downloads always seem to corrupt much quicker
CDs/DVds were never indestructible as many of us found out when mal-functioning players scratched the shit out of them.
I suppose the enviroment where you store them is as important as the quality of the discs used.Direct sunlight or extreme heat never advised
I'm only going on bought cds/dvds versus burnt downloads
The burnt downloads always seem to corrupt much quicker
Re: Future of Porn
It's a pity you can't just Scotchguard 'em....
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Future of Porn
As soon as Netflix started to take off first in the US and then in Canada with movie downloads for about $10 a month, that's when the ISP's started to pay attention and become rather miserly and desperate.
ISP's are controlled by media conglomerates which offer cable/satellite broadcasts of pay-per-view and VOD. So they were not going to let Netflix eat the whole pie. They clamped down and instituted download caps and limits and the feds were only too willing to go along with the stupid scheme.
A 150-300 GB limit is unheard of and extremely expensive. The average consumer would be unable to support that kind of monthly internet costs.
A lot of porn stuff these days is offered in HD and that eats a lot of your internet bandwidth usage. A short 20-30 minute scene in HD is quite big and if you are going to be downloading a number of scenes from one or a couple of web sites (21Sextury, Score, etc) in no time you will be hitting the cap ceiling of the average 60-90GB cap that the general consumer has set up.
I don't know how much of a choice you really have for standard definition porn downloads. I believe even Netflix has reduced the video resolution so that their customers can try to live within their ISP's cap limits.
So while ISP's in North America like to boast of fast internet connections, the consumer can take little comfort in that while the horse runs a little faster around the track, the size of the track is still the same.
The situation in Europe may be somewhat different and I hear that in Italy many ISP's do offer unlimited downloads with no caps. However the authorities do block certain sites from time to time that run afoul of copyright infringements (**********, etc).
With the closings of Megaupload and a number of other P2P/filelockers during that past year, downloads from other P2Ps are presently exceptionally slow, but sometimes people from different nations are forced to resort to somewhat "illegal" practices as there seems to be no workable legal solution to their acquiring certain programs in a legal fair way. I recall reading a blog discussion some months back about the success of the HBO miniseries GAME OF THRONES. Some people in other countries had to wait for several months before local broadcasters would acquire and broadcast the popular series, only to discover they had censored the nudity. So they resorted to download the uncensored episodes using torrents and P2P sites.
ISP's are controlled by media conglomerates which offer cable/satellite broadcasts of pay-per-view and VOD. So they were not going to let Netflix eat the whole pie. They clamped down and instituted download caps and limits and the feds were only too willing to go along with the stupid scheme.
A 150-300 GB limit is unheard of and extremely expensive. The average consumer would be unable to support that kind of monthly internet costs.
A lot of porn stuff these days is offered in HD and that eats a lot of your internet bandwidth usage. A short 20-30 minute scene in HD is quite big and if you are going to be downloading a number of scenes from one or a couple of web sites (21Sextury, Score, etc) in no time you will be hitting the cap ceiling of the average 60-90GB cap that the general consumer has set up.
I don't know how much of a choice you really have for standard definition porn downloads. I believe even Netflix has reduced the video resolution so that their customers can try to live within their ISP's cap limits.
So while ISP's in North America like to boast of fast internet connections, the consumer can take little comfort in that while the horse runs a little faster around the track, the size of the track is still the same.
The situation in Europe may be somewhat different and I hear that in Italy many ISP's do offer unlimited downloads with no caps. However the authorities do block certain sites from time to time that run afoul of copyright infringements (**********, etc).
With the closings of Megaupload and a number of other P2P/filelockers during that past year, downloads from other P2Ps are presently exceptionally slow, but sometimes people from different nations are forced to resort to somewhat "illegal" practices as there seems to be no workable legal solution to their acquiring certain programs in a legal fair way. I recall reading a blog discussion some months back about the success of the HBO miniseries GAME OF THRONES. Some people in other countries had to wait for several months before local broadcasters would acquire and broadcast the popular series, only to discover they had censored the nudity. So they resorted to download the uncensored episodes using torrents and P2P sites.
Re: Future of Porn
Here in the UK I have no cap [they did try it on, a couple of years back, but I
whinged until they relented]. I don't keep score but imagine that I might
sometimes d/l 50-100G a day, if it's HD stuff [most of which then gets burned
or deleted]. About ?35 per month, including TV down my phone, at about 550kb/s.
I fully expect them to make inroads on this at any time. With so many domestic
consumers now going for d/l HDV a bottleneck was inevitably going to occur. As
usual there has been a lack of joined-up thinking regarding how Hollywood and
the distribution networks will actually achieve this.... yet another benefit of
free-marketeering.
whinged until they relented]. I don't keep score but imagine that I might
sometimes d/l 50-100G a day, if it's HD stuff [most of which then gets burned
or deleted]. About ?35 per month, including TV down my phone, at about 550kb/s.
I fully expect them to make inroads on this at any time. With so many domestic
consumers now going for d/l HDV a bottleneck was inevitably going to occur. As
usual there has been a lack of joined-up thinking regarding how Hollywood and
the distribution networks will actually achieve this.... yet another benefit of
free-marketeering.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Future of Porn
Actually those limits were from the link you provided
To put this in perspective before i had a 100Gb limit I had 12GBs a month
400mbs a day
Made me awful choosy about exactly what i watched and downloaded
Most months i'd manage to avoid the 56K dial-up which was used for excess bandwidth as opposed to paying for it
If your only going to be viewing it on a 17inch LCD screen like me
SD is fine HD is waste of resources.
Even the Game of Thrones 2 seasons 550mb an episode
Horn blower 700mb-1Gb an episode i watched earlier this year werent all that taxing after being downloaded but I'd imagine anyone trying to watch them direct on big screen TV would be seeing double than bandwidth consumed.
You have to learn how the games played an then try and play within the rules
Its not impossible though I get the impression in this day and age not many have something called patience as they want it all for next to nothing
If they pay 10 dollars for month they expect again everything
To put this in perspective before i had a 100Gb limit I had 12GBs a month
400mbs a day
Made me awful choosy about exactly what i watched and downloaded
Most months i'd manage to avoid the 56K dial-up which was used for excess bandwidth as opposed to paying for it
If your only going to be viewing it on a 17inch LCD screen like me
SD is fine HD is waste of resources.
Even the Game of Thrones 2 seasons 550mb an episode
Horn blower 700mb-1Gb an episode i watched earlier this year werent all that taxing after being downloaded but I'd imagine anyone trying to watch them direct on big screen TV would be seeing double than bandwidth consumed.
You have to learn how the games played an then try and play within the rules
Its not impossible though I get the impression in this day and age not many have something called patience as they want it all for next to nothing
If they pay 10 dollars for month they expect again everything