Magoo wrat "the point I am trying to make is that if putting your cock in a womans pussy for two seconds in the real world (ie non-porn world) is classed as intercourse then why does it not count as intercourse in porn? As usual I await your pearls of wisdom Golostuda."
We are talking about performance though. I would liken the staged penetration shots to someone miming to a song. It may look to all the world like they are performing as a singer, but in truth - on that occasion - they are merely going through the motions. Therefore I think the word "simulated" applies. The pentration isn't simulated but the sex is.
attn: Alex
OT Re: attn: Alex
"if putting your cock in a womans pussy for two seconds in the real world (ie non-porn world) is classed as intercourse then why does it not count as intercourse in porn?"
hmm what about one second - does that count? it better be classed as intercourse in the real world cos if it doesnt then I am virgin cos 2 seconds is a marathon session for me! lol
Jason (sober and feeling more relaxed today....)
hmm what about one second - does that count? it better be classed as intercourse in the real world cos if it doesnt then I am virgin cos 2 seconds is a marathon session for me! lol
Jason (sober and feeling more relaxed today....)
Re: OT Re: attn: Alex
You can last 2 seconds? I'm still trying to break that "difficult" one second barrier )
Re: attn: Alex
.....this is beginning to veer toward the 'perception vs. reality' debate.
Which, with our government, seems entirely apt.
This is the bgaFd; you are talking about stills, simulated or otherwise; therefore, O/T.
If you watch the Private Castings series, which includes video of still shoots, there is quite a bit of 'movement'. BUT......the stills that are published show CONSIDERABLY more detail than, say, the Corrigan 'genital contact' set. The latter isn't h/c, IMO.
And re the legal analogy- if it could be somehow proved that an alleged rapist had only put his prick at the entrance of the victim's vagina, and not 'waved it about in a threatening manner', he'd still get done for indecent assault or something.
And as I understand it, even if you mime to a song, say in a karaoke bar, you are still legally 'publishing' the song, and you or the bar-owner would be bound by copyright law.
Hope that's muddied the waters even further...........
Nice to see Golly back, BTW- Magoo has missed him.
I keep telling him, in that event, to stop throwing things at him...........
Which, with our government, seems entirely apt.
This is the bgaFd; you are talking about stills, simulated or otherwise; therefore, O/T.
If you watch the Private Castings series, which includes video of still shoots, there is quite a bit of 'movement'. BUT......the stills that are published show CONSIDERABLY more detail than, say, the Corrigan 'genital contact' set. The latter isn't h/c, IMO.
And re the legal analogy- if it could be somehow proved that an alleged rapist had only put his prick at the entrance of the victim's vagina, and not 'waved it about in a threatening manner', he'd still get done for indecent assault or something.
And as I understand it, even if you mime to a song, say in a karaoke bar, you are still legally 'publishing' the song, and you or the bar-owner would be bound by copyright law.
Hope that's muddied the waters even further...........
Nice to see Golly back, BTW- Magoo has missed him.
I keep telling him, in that event, to stop throwing things at him...........
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
- Posts: 9910
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: attn: Alex
You only need watch one of Chritophe Clarks Private Castings to see how
staged the hardcore shoots really are...I could really have done without seeing even one...took the mystique right out of it for me
cheers
B....OZ
staged the hardcore shoots really are...I could really have done without seeing even one...took the mystique right out of it for me
cheers
B....OZ