Been Thrown off PurplePort

[mutanthalibut]

Nice one, well done.

Wonder if they'll reinstate the rest of us??
My breath isn't held.

[sparky]

Hi Tanya,

I'm pleased to read you are re-instated which implies your profile text and photos as now do not break the rules. Did they actually apologize about you seeking Gonzo work using PP? Was your profile edited by PP in any way before you were reinstated?

From AIR I found reference to this offshoot site of Madcowmodels

https://www.adultfolio.com/

It really does look adult orientated from the level options with not just high solo levels but HJ, BJ, BG Protected, BG certed, BB and GG.

Therefor in profiles models can openly state what they do and do not offer and photographers state what they seek without risk of deletion so saving time with enquiries.

I will create a profile there sometime.

[Tanya Cox]

Hi Sparky,

Yes I have joined Adult folio now too and have asked them if there is any shoot
levels that they don't allow (ie Gonzo or shooting for personal use ect) and they
replied saying no - they are allow all legal shoot levels.

My link is -

And no my profile on Purple Port is back exactly as I left it, they haven't edited
anything - ....

But in their defence now I have read through some of my messages again
i can see that some of my BG enquiries (that didn't go ahead anyway) aren't
very clear if I'm working with another professional performer or with the
photographer/videographer himself, so I just need to make sure that I double
check it is with another performer from now on. I have always just assumed if
they say BG instead of Gonzo/POV that it is with another professional but some
of those that messaged me about BG have been banned for Gonzo so I guess
its not always the case.

Most of us models are on enough of the sites for those wanting Gonzo to
message us from one of those that do allow it - so I advice all Gonzo producers
to stick to AIR, ItsAdult & Adultfolio from now on.

X

[sparky]

Tanya Cox wrote:

> Hi Sparky,
>
> ....
> But in their defence now I have read through some of my
> messages again
> i can see that some of my BG enquiries (that didn't go ahead
> anyway) aren't
> very clear if I'm working with another professional performer
> or with the
> photographer/videographer himself, so I just need to make sure
> that I double
> check it is with another performer from now on. I have always
> just assumed if
> they say BG instead of Gonzo/POV that it is with another
> professional but some
> of those that messaged me about BG have been banned for Gonzo
> so I guess
> its not always the case.
>
>

One of the issues with adult work always has been and always will be interpretation of definitions of content levels.

I always describe the content options e.g. wide open leg but no touching, using fingers or toys etc rather than UK/US mag, continental etc.

IMO generally while PP clearly state what must not be included in profiles more tolerance is needed for private messages. A model should not be penalized for an enquirer not using the terminology exactly as PP define it or requesting something outside of what is permitted within PP rules.

[ruggedscot]

https://www.adultfolio.com/

seems to be getting there and may be a good site

[wilkinsnaps]

Apologies to come to this thread late in the day. Adultfolio is indeed much better, insofar as it explicitly allows the setting up of boy/girl shoots and even POV shoots. It started after Madcow (which originally allowed such things) banned such things - it's run by the same guy. But he's equally autocratic when it comes to any infringements of the Adultfolio rules. An attempt by me to clarify what model was saying about her levels led to me being summarily booted off the site, with no possibility of appeal or re-joining.

So - Adultfolio is infinitely better than prudish, sanctimonious PP or PS - but be very careful not to appear to be pushing models' stated levels.

[Tanya Cox]

Oh dear Sorry to hear that happened to you;

but don't despair there is still.....



And maybe even some more new sites will come to light - anyone know of any
others that allow all adult levels?

X

[sparky]

wilkinsnaps wrote:

> Apologies to come to this thread late in the day. Adultfolio is
> indeed much better, insofar as it explicitly allows the setting
> up of boy/girl shoots and even POV shoots. It started after
> Madcow (which originally allowed such things) banned such
> things - it's run by the same guy. But he's equally autocratic
> when it comes to any infringements of the Adultfolio rules. An
> attempt by me to clarify what model was saying about her
> levels led to me being summarily booted off the site, with no
> possibility of appeal or re-joining.
>
> So - Adultfolio is infinitely better than prudish,
> sanctimonious PP or PS - but be very careful not to appear to
> be pushing models' stated levels.


Tanya Cox wrote:

> Oh dear Sorry to hear that happened to you;
>
> but don't despair there is still.....
>
>
>
> And maybe even some more new sites will come to light - anyone
> know of any
> others that allow all adult levels?
>
> X


I have not yet got around to attempting to create a profile on Adultfolio but was planning to do so soon to see who might be interested and available for a couple of shoots over the summer.

However based on this perhaps not worth trying. I have learnt to always clarify by description the levels offered since interpretations of UK mag, US mag etc vary. Once I am clear on what is being offered then the rate can be discussed.

I do sympathise with models constantly getting enquires for bookings that are obviously beyond the levels they openly state they work to. Hence if they say g/g only or strictly solo only and get asked for POV and b/g fair enough. However on an adult content orientated site to me asking for clarification of wide open leg, self-satisfaction, toys and insertions even w/s and what is offered for video is reasonable.

AIR is indeed still up and running but there are few new model profiles while many have not logged in for months.