Content Share

[one eyed jack]

...Because murder is illegal perhaps and no one at any level in porn takes this business that seriously to warrant such actions but Im sure you was joking

Seriously, if you read that article you will know that the chief exec Pete Johnson holds court with the Houses Of Parliament to get this act sanctioned so I would treat our adversary with a bit more respect than to make idle threats, even if its a joke.

People at ATVOD have been studying us on these forums and more to get a better understanding.

Such is the support to oppose this from going through that I reckon people would rather pack up their tents and go home just for an easy life.

This is a war they want to win. If you dont believe me, who was at the BBFC when the R18 Online scheme was launched?

That failed. Who has come back with attack phase 2 and sits at the House of Parliament to get processors to stop paying out? The clue is in this post

Murder is not an option !happy!

[Peter]

Nob3y wrote:


>
> And the few times I have offered content share I get told "no
> as i did too much and now need paid work"

Make sure you're not the mug that pays when others are getting a freebie.

"If you do it free for them, you do it free for me too" has been a good stance to take. I'm not subsidising other peoples lives and businesses.

[one eyed jack]

Does anyone expect to really make any money with all this get it for free kind of culture we are having?

Or maybe a lot of people dont care because the only reason they do it is a perfect excuse to get laid !shitstorm!

Present company excluded...Unless the shoe fits of course !happy!

[Peter]

one eyed jack wrote:

> Does anyone expect to really make any money with all this get
> it for free kind of culture we are having?

And does anyone declare it to the taxman? Payment in kind is a taxable income.

[JessicaLoProductions]

In my personal opinion content share is a fantastic thing. It allows all parties involved to make money over a sustained period of time rather than a quick usually low one off payment for the model. Thus I also believe it to be more fair.

How ever I totally agree that for most a content share is an excuse for most guys to screw a model. I should have added above that the content share I am advertising above is with Jessica Lo and not me. I am a producer and not a stud, I will never (as a personal rule) only ever involve my self in a shoot either behind a camera or in front of a computer.

Any way folks, while I am impressed at what a discussion my original post has sparked and the differences in opinions (which we are all entitled to) I would request that we please get back on topic:

If you wish to participate in a professional content share with a fantastic performer please contact me.

James - JLP

[Nob3y]

This is what I have said before. Now and then its fine but the amount thats been going on and with the same people it seems looking around the variuos threads the past year.

I think Im doing it wrong.. I go in with a paid shoot !!
What a mug I must be eh?

[videokim]

We were one of the first of the known Pro producers to do content share many years ago & can usually do up to 3 shoots a week, we have worked with well over 100 ladies & lots of guys doing content share & have never had a complaint.

Because of this we are usually the first point of call for girls/couples down south as they know we are genuine with a proven track record, as for making money...are any producers making serious money or are any making lots more than those who do content share?

We are just as known on the swinging scene as we are in the film industry so girls feel safe with John as he definitely ain't shooting porn for a leg over lol!,
all porn will revolve around content share one way or another in years to come until things pick up as it keeps us all working.

What would work better than content share taking into account everyones skint ?