Time for a change ?

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
alec

Re: Time for a change ?

Post by alec »

Phil McCavity wrote:
>
> One thing I have to establish is the site and forum only for
> Hard Core models.

It's really only for hard core, though there are some soft-ish titles listed. The job of keeping track is big enough as it is.

> Maybe
> the UK has be flung into this thirst for ultimate hard-core
> so suddenly the genuine "what turns us on" is being missed.

I agree that one of the things absent from hard core videos (wherever they are made) is "what turns us on" - if I can interpret that as eroticism. I think you used the phrase 'will she won't she' in a post some time ago. I think this fits in here. I'd call it erotic tension or erotic situation. There's nothing wrong with well-shot, well-directed hard core sex, but personally I'd like to see some erotic tension as well - and I don't mean big budget 'erotic thrillers' pretending to be hard core versions of Die Hard or similar. They could be a series of short unrelated scenes but with an erotic edge and including the seduction and build up and then going on to the hard core. Very few porn films have done this. For example, I like gang bang films, but what is almost always absent is the thrill of seing how such an event could actually develop - the 'will she, won't she' part. Some of the most erotic scenes I've seen have been in soft core and sometimes fairly mainstream films, e.g. Rebecca de Mornay and Tom Cruise on the subway in Risky Business, that plump-ish Aussie girl and a bloke on the top deck of a bus in Hong Kong in Felicity, a few scenes from Emmannuelle and Nine and a Half Weeks - if only the boring bits of those could have been replaced with hard core! - and a few seconds of 10 where Bo Derek tells Dudley Moore what she likes to do to the accompaniment of Ravel's Bolero. This sort of scene happens probably in less than 1% of porn films - Britt Morgan being used as the stake in a game of poker in Queen of Hearts springs to mind, as does the first scene in Gang Bang girl 15 (unfortunately not the Nici Sterling scene though that is good for other reasons) and there are a few others, but they are rare.
I prefer porn to stimulate an erection via the brain and the imagination, though I don't deny that it still works by the direct route too.
William Bonus

Re: Time for a change ?

Post by William Bonus »

OK.. fixed it :)
Pic working now...
Hope you like it...
W.
alec

Re: Time for a change ?

Post by alec »

Just tinkered with your post to make it a direct link.

I like the design (I hope TM video do too!), but any changes of this sort depend on Phil K's approval and his time, and we also have to consider, bearing in mind Teresa's generosity, how long it should be before we change the home page. The present one hasn't been there for all that long.
Clunk

Hold on to your posing pouch, Phil Mc' !

Post by Clunk »


I don't think I explained my remark very well,(or not at all) in my first post . Let me put things right here, I do think Teresa May is a very attractive women I just meant that the picture on the main page is a very poor one, and does not do her justice at all !

And for the argument that she isn't a hardcore model , it doesn't bother me either way as long as she's British, and everybody knows Teresa is a national icon ! So I would be more than happy for Teresa May to stay on the main page as long as it's a better picture . Simple as that !

My suggestion about having a photo of Rebekah, on the main page, was for the simple idea that she is a regular visitor to the forum, and it would be nice for us, and her I presume, to show our appreciation and have her picture put up . END
Ned

No it isn't.

Post by Ned »

The link doesn't work. Forbidden.
alec

Re: No it isn't.

Post by alec »

The direct link gave me forbidden too, but if you copy and paste it into your browser it seems to work. So I've altered it again.
alec

Misunderstandings all round

Post by alec »

Just realised - I meant less of the personal insults directed aginst the models, not those directed at those who insult the models. But Clunk has explained he didn't mean to insult Teresa; so the rebuke wasn't necessary anyway.
eric

Re: Time for a change ?

Post by eric »

Alec, you and the team are doing a fine job. If it aint broke - dont fix it!
woodgnome

Re: Hold on to your posing pouch, Phil Mc' !

Post by woodgnome »

i'll second your nomination of rebekah as a potential replacement.

another option might be a montage, created by some photoshop wielding genius, of rebekaah, layla~jade and wendy - who all of whom contribute to the forum on a regular basis.
Flett

Re: Time for a change ?

Post by Flett »

I'kk second that.
Locked