Mandatory condom use & permits to film?

[ChristianXXX]

PS - shelley lubben did 10-15 scenes total about 20 years ago not 100+

[videokim]

I have great respect for everyone on this forum & i honestly don't care what their film tastes are soft to extreme as that is what porn is about.
I am not trying to push a condom law for UK porn only explain its benefits, i for one would not be told how to make my films & i don't think others should be.
The politics of promoting safe sex to the public would have given porn a new acceptable look as well as the extra protection to the stars but it should be optional & progress from there.

The main reason we used condoms when we began was because there was no tests when we started & stars had to wait until they caught a dose before getting treated, we carried on with condoms when certs were introduced because by then we were well known & it didn't matter by then what we wore. Conditions now are the best they have ever been for the stars but for the producers it will keep changing as its always done & we have to change with it.

[one eyed jack]

Thanks for correcting me Christian. I mustve read the wrong info somewwhere. Ok I can allow her if she has done 10 to 15. Its the girls like Leanne Young that bug me.

At what point after 100 scenes plus and a few years escorting and pimping girls out, do you suddenly regret everything???

[Eddie Sex]

i find watching condom porn is not as entertaining and would be disappointed if it became mandatory in UK.

i know we all worry about our sexual health and so do i, however i have slept with hundreds of girls and never caught anything.

[william]

Hi

Im an amature - totally open and honest about it Im not in it to make money or for any websites I like to make my own porn and I have worked with a few known models and a few unknowns. The one thing I do is make sure that Im certed. I dont do it very often and when I do I know and Ill get certed and ensure that the girl is certed to.

Its fantasy and its fun - the rawness of it is somewhat diluted with a condom. I like to see the wetness of her pussy on my cock - I like to see the way her mouth wraps around the cock and to have a condom on that would only serve to put in a barrier to the proceedings. It would take something away and it would be as intense.

Very rarely have I done a scene using a condom that has actually felt vivid - its just not all the way there and that comes through in what I have shot. Its hard to explain fully.

Ive not done anal and Ive stuck to vaginal and oral with either cum on face cum in pussy or facial style endings. And its been a fun hobby. Dont do as much now but still like to be around the scene and if the chance occurs then Id do a scene.

Ive been lucky in that Ive shot with some great females attractive and way out my league. Some say why dont I use an escort - well I did think about it but well it would be the same - its a hobby and I value the shoot and the poses and want the girl to know what to do and how to strike poses. I just feel that an escort would be about the end goal and not about the shoot. Also I feel safer with models and they come across as eager to work to get the results that Im wanting. A messy facial or an erotic handjob - something that I can keep and enjoy myself.

Im out with the manditory condom thing and wonder where this will eventually end up - are they trying to bring in legislation through the back door to try and curtail and reduce demand ?

Even watching porn I find watching a condomed guy not as fun as a bare one - you just know hes not getting the full experiance from the encounter and it feels faker as a result.

[one eyed jack]

William wrote:

Im out with the manditory condom thing and wonder where this will eventually end up - are they trying to bring in legislation through the back door to try and curtail and reduce demand ?


Not to my knowledge but now the mayor of California has done it I'm sure some busy body will take this as an agenda to parliament and try and push for it because in a roundabout way its just another attack on the porn industry like all the other legislation and stealth taxes that are used to continually rattle the porn producing contingent year in, year out.

Its as if they use these things to justify getting money out of what they consider an immoral business. Like the local councils do with the sex shops. Why do they charge an exorbitant licence fee for selling sex products that they would charge a 24 hour convenience store?