Batfucks - that's why its called DARK NIGHT

[Dave Wells]

If people aren't jealous of the budget, there's something very wrong with them !

[The_Juan]

So there are two batman porn parodies?

[one eyed jack]

I have friends and family that respect and love me. I have a nice little corner where I run my business and able to support a lifestyle and my family.

Why should I be jealous of a company that spends gazillions on porn films??? If thats the case I would have a picture of james Cameron and throwing darts at it for making Avatar...Which doesnt have sex in it so I couldnt ask him that.

If Avatar was a porn film I would be seriously upset.

Ive said it before that I dont have an axe to grind with the Blue Bird people. They pump a lot of money into this business of porn and are premiere division players employing lots of girls and boys.

That is a good thing.

No one (including myself) is above criticism. A question is not put forward out of jealousy. My apologies if i didnt follow the legions of people that said it was great.

It looks great. I asked where was the sex in it and Hiwatt kindly furnished me with a pic of a group orgy.

End of.

[one eyed jack]

No Dave. Blue Bird arent the only company that have spent big money on ambitious productions.

I am not jealous of anyone in this business at all. Hand on heart. Scouts honour and all that rubbish.

People who envy do so with a desire to want to succeed but jealousy is a negative all consuming emotion worthy of losers.

In fact my comments levelled at this production were based on experience of seeing other films of similar calbre that didnt have that much sex in it, or the lamest sex scenes because they focussed on what they saw as a great set piece, stunts and all the bullshit that doesnt make my willy hard in the slightest.

hey wanyone remeber that american porn movie that had the morphing special effects from the same software as Terminator...Yep..the film was dull as ditchwater.

[jimslip]

I think it's a little unfair to suggest that any questioning of a Bluebird product should be immediately perceived as being "Negative" or "Jealous" and in turn silenced.

On the face of it, the pics look like some good work by a make-up artist who has experience in the horror genre. This does not by definition make the work in itself a "good" porn film.

The true judges of a "Good" porn movie or any other movie for that matter are the number of people who are actually willing to PAY to see it and having PAYED for it, enjoyed it and wish to PAY to see more from the same producer. So time will be the judge of whether this film is good or not.

The simple fact is the World is full of porn junkies who are full of opinions on what is "Good" or "Bad" porn, but wouldn't actually ever dream of putting their money where their mouthes are. They vocalise their opinions and then trawl the internet for a "Freebie". In my experience you never hear a peep out of the actual purchasers of porn and I reckon 98% of them don't go on this or any other porn discussion forum.

They are one of porn's great and most treasured enigmas- "The Silent Paying Majority"

P.S. I'm not jealous by the way!

[jazzbone]

Hi again,Just to clear up any misunderstanding I only said "certain other producers" I dont see any reason to name any names,from a punters point of view(ie me) some good porn like this that has ideas and some money behind is way ahead of some gonzo crap thats been filmed in a ?19 a day travelodge room.

[jazzbone]

Hi again,Just to clear up any misunderstanding I only said "certain other producers" I dont see any reason to name any names,from a punters point of view(ie me) some good porn like this that has ideas and some money behind is way ahead of some gonzo crap thats been filmed in a ?19 a day travelodge room.

[jimslip]

You said:
"some good porn like this"

How do you know it's "Good?" have you paid to see it? If you have I'm pleased for you. Either way, you can't write everything else as off as, "Crap" that isn't in a set with people caked in make-up, latex and coloured lights.

I have no axe to grind either way as I believe there is room for everybody, in the same way as you'll get a film like Avatar costing $100,000,000 and another film like, "Quarantene" costing $1,000,000, they are both great in their own ways, although completely different.

Many people value the actual personas of the models themselves, they don't want to see them behind a mask that a director has created. The locations are irrelevant. This is "Gonzo" and this is what you call "Crap". Millions love it all the same.

Artistically, there is value in all the genres of porn. However as I said before it is the Great Paying Public that ultimately decide what is "Crap" and what is, "Great".

I have a good friend who is a great director of the "Big porn movie genre" and he used to love tearing me apart for what I do. After one heated argument that nearly came to blows, we both decided that at the end of the day, all of it is a load of bollocks and not worth arguing about and we never argued about the topic again.

Life's too short.

[Ron T. Storm]

And here is one of the early sketchings of the BlackMask and Shay Hendrix... took 5 minutes to do.

[img]http://www.nude2rude.com/images/comic/I ... _comic.jpg[/img]

Ron.

[Ron T. Storm]

Fuckit. I really want to argue with what you have said but you make perfect sense. A really good and valid factual discussion there.