Bluebird's TV Babes
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
I know: if only Vostok could re-write my posts he'd be able to get them to agree with what he's trying to say !
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
God you're tryin hard ain't ya !
"And that the Kelly Bell boy/girl footage was originally advertised to be shown with "generation 2" last September?". No - it wasn't. There was never any such 'advert' or claim. Period.
I see you are already well into your wise monkey act over NATASHA from Bang Babes: as predicted.
So: now you can go into further blind/deaf/dumbness over KELLY BELL.
[IMG]http://thumbnails10.imagebam.com/4044/cd7c3c40437590.gif[/IMG]
"And that the Kelly Bell boy/girl footage was originally advertised to be shown with "generation 2" last September?". No - it wasn't. There was never any such 'advert' or claim. Period.
I see you are already well into your wise monkey act over NATASHA from Bang Babes: as predicted.
So: now you can go into further blind/deaf/dumbness over KELLY BELL.
[IMG]http://thumbnails10.imagebam.com/4044/cd7c3c40437590.gif[/IMG]
-
ferguson2199
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
yeah give us a link to trailer to this scene or more piccies of her in action.
p.s will this scene defo be out on the 4th on the web.
p.s will this scene defo be out on the 4th on the web.
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
I'm awaiting confirmation from BB America as to whether TV Babes XXX will go live with the 4 July launch. Will let you know when I hear.
I'd love to give you more but I don't have it !
I'd love to give you more but I don't have it !
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
hiwatt wrote:
?God you?re tryin hard ain?t ya !
?And that the Kelly Bell boy/girl footage was originally
advertised to be shown with ?generation 2? last September??. No
- it wasn?t. There was never any such ?advert? or claim.
Period.
As stated by yourself in the ?TV BABES XXX? thread:
Nice to see the interest. We?re always busy, and we have in fact already shot some TV Babes XXX content. No, we can?t tell you who [until publication] - that?s part of the deal with the girls. Just responding to a couple of posters: it?s not ?Bluebird?s price?. It?s the girl?s price, because they are working on a big front end fee plus royalties.
As for Kelly Bell, she?s already shot for Bluebird, as you?ll see in September."
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=78449&t=76829
Please bear in mind that the above reference to Kelly Bell was made in the ?TV BABES XXX? thread. A thread where you asked
?Who would willingly pay ?x for a 30 minute internet wmv boy/girl Scene featuring...Kelly Bell: ?50 ? ?30 ? ?20 ?
Now if you had stated:
?As for Kelly Bell, she?s already shot glamour shots and or girl/girl for the Bluebird release MURDER MYSTERY WEEKEND, as you?ll see in September?
then perhaps there wouldn?t have been a lack of faith in BlueBird to deliver?
As I said before: A better deal/seduction takes place when things are crystal clear. As clear as a ?Kelly? Bell.
Even Kelly Bell herself was confused by what you said.
Here is a quote from Kelly:
?Oh Bluebird.... said I have shot some BG stuff for them & will be doing more in the future. READ MY LIPS. I will never do BG stuff-ever! Oh & have never shot any either
Hope that cleared it up?
Kells x?
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p ... 4#pid23504
hiwatt wrote:
?I see you are already well into your wise monkey act over
NATASHA from Bang Babes: as predicted.?
As I said before, the money is ready and waiting:
?A shiny new pre-pay mastercard loaded with ?100 is ready and waiting!
(It has been since you first mentioned ?TV BABES XXX? in the Spring last year.)?
hiwatt wrote:
?So: now you can go into further blind/deaf/dumbness over KELLY
BELL.
Perhaps you can tell us exactly what Ms Bell has shot for BlueBird? Girl/Girl? Glamour shots? Since you consider me blind/deaf/dumb perhaps you could spell it out clearly? Can you?
?God you?re tryin hard ain?t ya !
?And that the Kelly Bell boy/girl footage was originally
advertised to be shown with ?generation 2? last September??. No
- it wasn?t. There was never any such ?advert? or claim.
Period.
As stated by yourself in the ?TV BABES XXX? thread:
Nice to see the interest. We?re always busy, and we have in fact already shot some TV Babes XXX content. No, we can?t tell you who [until publication] - that?s part of the deal with the girls. Just responding to a couple of posters: it?s not ?Bluebird?s price?. It?s the girl?s price, because they are working on a big front end fee plus royalties.
As for Kelly Bell, she?s already shot for Bluebird, as you?ll see in September."
http://bgafd.co.uk/forum/read.php?f=5&i=78449&t=76829
Please bear in mind that the above reference to Kelly Bell was made in the ?TV BABES XXX? thread. A thread where you asked
?Who would willingly pay ?x for a 30 minute internet wmv boy/girl Scene featuring...Kelly Bell: ?50 ? ?30 ? ?20 ?
Now if you had stated:
?As for Kelly Bell, she?s already shot glamour shots and or girl/girl for the Bluebird release MURDER MYSTERY WEEKEND, as you?ll see in September?
then perhaps there wouldn?t have been a lack of faith in BlueBird to deliver?
As I said before: A better deal/seduction takes place when things are crystal clear. As clear as a ?Kelly? Bell.
Even Kelly Bell herself was confused by what you said.
Here is a quote from Kelly:
?Oh Bluebird.... said I have shot some BG stuff for them & will be doing more in the future. READ MY LIPS. I will never do BG stuff-ever! Oh & have never shot any either
Hope that cleared it up?
Kells x?
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.p ... 4#pid23504
hiwatt wrote:
?I see you are already well into your wise monkey act over
NATASHA from Bang Babes: as predicted.?
As I said before, the money is ready and waiting:
?A shiny new pre-pay mastercard loaded with ?100 is ready and waiting!
(It has been since you first mentioned ?TV BABES XXX? in the Spring last year.)?
hiwatt wrote:
?So: now you can go into further blind/deaf/dumbness over KELLY
BELL.
Perhaps you can tell us exactly what Ms Bell has shot for BlueBird? Girl/Girl? Glamour shots? Since you consider me blind/deaf/dumb perhaps you could spell it out clearly? Can you?
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
"Perhaps you can tell us exactly what Ms Bell has shot for BlueBird? Girl/Girl? Glamour shots? Since you consider me blind/deaf/dumb perhaps you could spell it out clearly? Can you?"
Yes.
[IMG]http://thumbnails3.imagebam.com/4050/cb80a140497592.gif[/IMG]
Free Image Hosting by ImageBam.com
Well Vostok 1: you've had a good run flaming BB on various forums. As you now accept, your 'BB lying' allegation was invented out of your own misinterpretation of previous posts.
Of course, Kelly wasn't reacting to what BB said, but rather to your inventions. So perhaps you'd better apologise to Kelly now for upsetting her over things the company she did actually shoot for never said. Just post here to confirm that you have done so. You might try to inject some common sense into your little world by realising that we actually know Kelly (and have done for years): and not just at the end of a TV phone line fantasy.
So there we go. Everything we actually said was true. It is our perogative as producer to decide when we publish content. The new VOD & Member site launches on the appropriate American date - 4th July - and we look forward to receiving your $32.99 each for Natasha and Kelly (to begin with).
It really is a shame that you've injected so much negativity into something that is after all Entertainment, just to run your little hobby horse. But it's over now in the face of the facts. We're bored with it, genuine customers are bored with it.
On the bright side, we have lovely TV Babes XXX to share with the genuine fans, and you've got egg all over your keyboard !happy!
Yes.
[IMG]http://thumbnails3.imagebam.com/4050/cb80a140497592.gif[/IMG]
Free Image Hosting by ImageBam.com
Well Vostok 1: you've had a good run flaming BB on various forums. As you now accept, your 'BB lying' allegation was invented out of your own misinterpretation of previous posts.
Of course, Kelly wasn't reacting to what BB said, but rather to your inventions. So perhaps you'd better apologise to Kelly now for upsetting her over things the company she did actually shoot for never said. Just post here to confirm that you have done so. You might try to inject some common sense into your little world by realising that we actually know Kelly (and have done for years): and not just at the end of a TV phone line fantasy.
So there we go. Everything we actually said was true. It is our perogative as producer to decide when we publish content. The new VOD & Member site launches on the appropriate American date - 4th July - and we look forward to receiving your $32.99 each for Natasha and Kelly (to begin with).
It really is a shame that you've injected so much negativity into something that is after all Entertainment, just to run your little hobby horse. But it's over now in the face of the facts. We're bored with it, genuine customers are bored with it.
On the bright side, we have lovely TV Babes XXX to share with the genuine fans, and you've got egg all over your keyboard !happy!
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
And Vostok1: while we're at it, let's just finish off your other little invention.
Here's what we originally posted.
"You'll be seeing more of lovely Michelle then you ever imagined. How about the scene from PSYCHOWARD, where she plays a Grenadier Guard alongside busty Valerie Pearl and lissome Cindy Behr: then the Sergeant Major walks in. Or SEANCE - her first Feature Movie where... no it's to much. OK: devils, gang bang, DP. And these are simply cherries on the trifle. The Thorneado is coming this summer."
As to PSYCHOWARD: well there it all is in Michelle's full grenadier guard glory, AS ADVERTISED - buy it now at BBfilms.com
As to SEANCE - at no point do we say that Michelle's doing DP or done it.
If you go and watch SEANCE -now online at BBFilms - you will see exactly what the quoted words were referring to: go on - have a look at the final scene of the movie when it's up.
That really is it, I think. Be nice if you corrected yourself on this and other Forms, and possibly apologised for wasting so much of everyone's time, when all we want to do is make, share and enjoy adult Entertainment. !happy!
Here's what we originally posted.
"You'll be seeing more of lovely Michelle then you ever imagined. How about the scene from PSYCHOWARD, where she plays a Grenadier Guard alongside busty Valerie Pearl and lissome Cindy Behr: then the Sergeant Major walks in. Or SEANCE - her first Feature Movie where... no it's to much. OK: devils, gang bang, DP. And these are simply cherries on the trifle. The Thorneado is coming this summer."
As to PSYCHOWARD: well there it all is in Michelle's full grenadier guard glory, AS ADVERTISED - buy it now at BBfilms.com
As to SEANCE - at no point do we say that Michelle's doing DP or done it.
If you go and watch SEANCE -now online at BBFilms - you will see exactly what the quoted words were referring to: go on - have a look at the final scene of the movie when it's up.
That really is it, I think. Be nice if you corrected yourself on this and other Forms, and possibly apologised for wasting so much of everyone's time, when all we want to do is make, share and enjoy adult Entertainment. !happy!
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
hiwatt wrote:
> Well Vostok 1: you?ve had a good run flaming BB on various
> forums. As you now accept, your ?BB lying? allegation was
> invented out of your own misinterpretation of previous posts.
Please show me where I have EVER claimed that BlueBird are lying.
Please link to any post in my history where I have said that.
As for my ?own misinterpretation of previous posts?: I misinterpreted nothing.
I stated that OTHERS have misinterpreted what you have said.
That would be the people that accused you of lying.
Search the ?BlueBird are Rubbish? thread and you will see those peoples names.
Search the issue concerning the ?Michelle Thorne DP? and you will see that I reminded the forum that you never stated that there was a Michelle Thorne DP scene, rather that you would ask her if she would be willing to shoot one.
> Of course, Kelly wasn?t reacting to what BB said, but rather to
> your inventions.
What inventions? Quote me, link to my posts where I invented anything about Kelly Bell and BlueBird. Show the forum these inventions. Show the forum this. Expose these lies of mine for all to see.
> So perhaps you?d better apologise to Kelly now
> for upsetting her over things the company she did actually
> shoot for never said. Just post here to confirm that you have
> done so. You might try to inject some common sense into your
> little world by realising that we actually know Kelly (and have
> done for years): and not just at the end of a TV phone line
> fantasy.
Was it me that brought Kellys attention to this forum?
No it was not.
Was it you who asked how much forum members would be willing to pay to see Kelly in a ?30 min hardcore boy/girl wmv scene?? Yes it was.
Yes, you know Kelly Bell. I do not. But as you know her you know full well that she has no intention of shooting boy/girl. Not now, not ever. You know this but you choose to ask the question ?how much would you be willing to pay to see her in a boy/girl scene?.
Why would you do this?
And you want me to apologise for a question you asked?
> So there we go. Everything we actually said was true.
One again, quote, link to any post where I have accused you or bluebird of lying. Please do. Quote me happy. Expose me for all to see.
> It is our
> perogative as producer to decide when we publish content. The
> new VOD & Member site launches on the appropriate American date
> - 4th July - and we look forward to receiving your $32.99 each
> for Natasha and Kelly (to begin with).
Thanks. I look forward to it.
> It really is a shame that you?ve injected so much negativity
> into something that is after all Entertainment, just to run
> your little hobby horse. But it?s over now in the face of the
> facts. We?re bored with it, genuine customers are bored with
> it.
But for clarity I would like you to provide proof of the allegations you have made about me. And when you realise that you were wrong I expect a full and frank apology.
> On the bright side, we have lovely TV Babes XXX to share with
> the genuine fans, and you?ve got egg all over your keyboard.
> Well Vostok 1: you?ve had a good run flaming BB on various
> forums. As you now accept, your ?BB lying? allegation was
> invented out of your own misinterpretation of previous posts.
Please show me where I have EVER claimed that BlueBird are lying.
Please link to any post in my history where I have said that.
As for my ?own misinterpretation of previous posts?: I misinterpreted nothing.
I stated that OTHERS have misinterpreted what you have said.
That would be the people that accused you of lying.
Search the ?BlueBird are Rubbish? thread and you will see those peoples names.
Search the issue concerning the ?Michelle Thorne DP? and you will see that I reminded the forum that you never stated that there was a Michelle Thorne DP scene, rather that you would ask her if she would be willing to shoot one.
> Of course, Kelly wasn?t reacting to what BB said, but rather to
> your inventions.
What inventions? Quote me, link to my posts where I invented anything about Kelly Bell and BlueBird. Show the forum these inventions. Show the forum this. Expose these lies of mine for all to see.
> So perhaps you?d better apologise to Kelly now
> for upsetting her over things the company she did actually
> shoot for never said. Just post here to confirm that you have
> done so. You might try to inject some common sense into your
> little world by realising that we actually know Kelly (and have
> done for years): and not just at the end of a TV phone line
> fantasy.
Was it me that brought Kellys attention to this forum?
No it was not.
Was it you who asked how much forum members would be willing to pay to see Kelly in a ?30 min hardcore boy/girl wmv scene?? Yes it was.
Yes, you know Kelly Bell. I do not. But as you know her you know full well that she has no intention of shooting boy/girl. Not now, not ever. You know this but you choose to ask the question ?how much would you be willing to pay to see her in a boy/girl scene?.
Why would you do this?
And you want me to apologise for a question you asked?
> So there we go. Everything we actually said was true.
One again, quote, link to any post where I have accused you or bluebird of lying. Please do. Quote me happy. Expose me for all to see.
> It is our
> perogative as producer to decide when we publish content. The
> new VOD & Member site launches on the appropriate American date
> - 4th July - and we look forward to receiving your $32.99 each
> for Natasha and Kelly (to begin with).
Thanks. I look forward to it.
> It really is a shame that you?ve injected so much negativity
> into something that is after all Entertainment, just to run
> your little hobby horse. But it?s over now in the face of the
> facts. We?re bored with it, genuine customers are bored with
> it.
But for clarity I would like you to provide proof of the allegations you have made about me. And when you realise that you were wrong I expect a full and frank apology.
> On the bright side, we have lovely TV Babes XXX to share with
> the genuine fans, and you?ve got egg all over your keyboard.
Re: Bluebird's TV Babes
why is it when i try to join bluebirdfilms it says error