*BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
-
jj
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
No it ain't: it's about 'Woody's new thing'.
Which as I understand it, is ours......
Which as I understand it, is ours......
-
woodgnome
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
congratulations! you are now - officially - a critic! 
a good model for other reviews re. video suppliers - detailed info borne of considerable experience.
a good model for other reviews re. video suppliers - detailed info borne of considerable experience.
-
marcusallen
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
Too tech for me.
I have even consulted The Chairman(who's advice was totally uselsess) - I never said that -
So I wi;ll attempt on the morrow.
I have even consulted The Chairman(who's advice was totally uselsess) - I never said that -
So I wi;ll attempt on the morrow.
-
Steven
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
Hi there,
Excellent idea and excellent work. I think this advancement is a welcome addition to the site. Now that you have been able to add this new feature to the websites pages, can we expect to see it applied to the FILMS pages some time in the future? I just think there are an awful lot of films without reviews which people must have seen and would surely submit reviws of to benefit the others, if only it was made easier i.e. by slapping a POST REVIEW link on each page.
Just a thought.
Excellent idea and excellent work. I think this advancement is a welcome addition to the site. Now that you have been able to add this new feature to the websites pages, can we expect to see it applied to the FILMS pages some time in the future? I just think there are an awful lot of films without reviews which people must have seen and would surely submit reviws of to benefit the others, if only it was made easier i.e. by slapping a POST REVIEW link on each page.
Just a thought.
-
steve56
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
ijust like to say,well done woodgnome ireally enjoy visiting this site,ive also learnt quite a lot through it.
-
jj
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
I'll stick to 'reviewer' if that's OK......the term 'critic' gives me the willies.
But, howsoever, I thnk you.
But, howsoever, I thnk you.
-
jj
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
......meanwhile, it's not too hard just to e-mail it to the Guys, is it?
Err... ooops...back to me keyboard.....
Just a thought: that review took me about 10 minutes, off the top of my head, whereas the average film write-up (watching it about twice through, say) so far pans out in the region of 12 hours. Different kettle of fish, I think.
Err... ooops...back to me keyboard.....
Just a thought: that review took me about 10 minutes, off the top of my head, whereas the average film write-up (watching it about twice through, say) so far pans out in the region of 12 hours. Different kettle of fish, I think.
-
todge
Re: *BGAFD ANNOUNCEMENT*
woodgnome,
I may as well chip in with my fivepennysworth..........
Film reviews are great - particularly when they list in detail
exactly what happens.
If I were a supplier of videos or models though,I'd be a
little worried.
What happens when someone posts a review which ,while complying with the review guidelines,is less than complimentary.
What if it's just someone capable of producing a well-written piece of fiction- just to be plain mischevious,malicious etc etc
Isn't that going to be hard to refute for those concerned and
possibly lead to lost business.
In short,how can you possibly verify the genuine gripes and
what right of reply will the accused have ?
I may as well chip in with my fivepennysworth..........
Film reviews are great - particularly when they list in detail
exactly what happens.
If I were a supplier of videos or models though,I'd be a
little worried.
What happens when someone posts a review which ,while complying with the review guidelines,is less than complimentary.
What if it's just someone capable of producing a well-written piece of fiction- just to be plain mischevious,malicious etc etc
Isn't that going to be hard to refute for those concerned and
possibly lead to lost business.
In short,how can you possibly verify the genuine gripes and
what right of reply will the accused have ?