More chance of hell freezing over dabbers, than getting a response from her.
Parents in porn
Re: Parents in porn
Does'nt your mag have its own e-mail addresses...or do you need to hide behind a hotmail account because you know that what you are thinking of doing is bang out of order.
How can it be a fun article....you people must be F****** Mad
How can it be a fun article....you people must be F****** Mad
Re: Parents in porn
Wholly inappropriate, but hardly unexpected from a magazine culture that seeks to sexualize increasingly younger girls. The original posters enquiry should IMHO be forwarded to senior executives at publishers EMAP and the Press Complaints Commission or whatever similar body deals with periodicals. Either it's a hoax, in which case the publishers are not going to like of their magazine being associated with such an enquiry, or it's genuine, in which case all involved deserve reprimanding severely for their abhorrent ideas.
This sort of cynical exploitative 'journalism' is a far more mendacious threat to the safety and wellbeing of teenagers than 'porn folk' ever will be!
phil
This sort of cynical exploitative 'journalism' is a far more mendacious threat to the safety and wellbeing of teenagers than 'porn folk' ever will be!
phil
Re: Parents in porn
British Producers/Porn stars like to keep an healthy distance between their children & porn. The drug / vice squad don't go on shows or mags with their children & the same rules apply with us.
The editor of this mag is one very sick person to even think of doing such a feature, things must be very bad for you guys to have to sink to these levels.
Kim
The editor of this mag is one very sick person to even think of doing such a feature, things must be very bad for you guys to have to sink to these levels.
Kim
Kims Amateurs The original & still the best UK amateurs...often imitated never equalled
https://twitter.com/bustykim
https://twitter.com/kimsamateurs
[email]videokim69@hotmail.com[/email]
[email]videokim69@gmail
https://twitter.com/bustykim
https://twitter.com/kimsamateurs
[email]videokim69@hotmail.com[/email]
[email]videokim69@gmail
Re: Parents in porn
Well done "Emily", you're about as popular as a turd in a swimming pool !!
Career Advice: Find out what you like doing best and get someone to pay you for doing it.
[url]http://www.nylonstockingsluts.com[/url]
Twitter: @stockingsluts
[url]http://www.nylonstockingsluts.com[/url]
Twitter: @stockingsluts
Re: Parents in porn
hoax or real, scum all the same!!
-
forepl4yer
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Parents in porn
14-19 yrs... 14 - 17 is a too young to link children with porn.
It is very likely, however that children this young are exposed to porn, by the people who peddle their wares on the internet i.e. you guys.
Obviously, this exposure is not intended, and precautions are taken, such as 18 warnings etc., along with parental controls by ISP / Web Browsers.
Naturally the intention is to aim such material only at us open-minded free thinking adults, and bless you for that.
Not forgetting that the age range mentioned above include 18 + 19 year olds, of which the adult industry is more than happy to lure into porn, especially if it means producing 'teeny' material, albeit it with a discalimer that all models used are over the age of 18 etc. So people of this age range (18-19) are often linked to the adult industry, by virtue of the fact that they are working in it.
Whilst Uk producers probably like to keep a healthy distance between their own children and porn. They have no qualms about using other peoples children (18+) in their productions. Even if the parents of these children would like an equally healthy distance kept between their own offspring and porn.
Yes, I know 18 years olds and over are adults etc..
Glass houses and stones...
P.S I love UK porn.. so keep up the good work!
It is very likely, however that children this young are exposed to porn, by the people who peddle their wares on the internet i.e. you guys.
Obviously, this exposure is not intended, and precautions are taken, such as 18 warnings etc., along with parental controls by ISP / Web Browsers.
Naturally the intention is to aim such material only at us open-minded free thinking adults, and bless you for that.
Not forgetting that the age range mentioned above include 18 + 19 year olds, of which the adult industry is more than happy to lure into porn, especially if it means producing 'teeny' material, albeit it with a discalimer that all models used are over the age of 18 etc. So people of this age range (18-19) are often linked to the adult industry, by virtue of the fact that they are working in it.
Whilst Uk producers probably like to keep a healthy distance between their own children and porn. They have no qualms about using other peoples children (18+) in their productions. Even if the parents of these children would like an equally healthy distance kept between their own offspring and porn.
Yes, I know 18 years olds and over are adults etc..
Glass houses and stones...
P.S I love UK porn.. so keep up the good work!
You can get further with a kind word and a gun than you can with just a kind word.
Re: Parents in porn
Wow, I never wanted to piss anyone off. All the comments are totally valid and I can assure you we're not out to exploit anyone. Of course we'd never err on the side of anything pornographic, or exploitative. Teen mags have to be so careful about anything that crosses that line and as a journalist I'd never entertain the idea of putting my readers in that position.
I can assure you it's not a mucky feature, it's about how teenagers cope when their parents have 'embarassing' jobs - not just those in the sex industry either. It's great how many moral people there are out there armed with stones and happy to throw them from their glass houses!
I can assure you it's not a mucky feature, it's about how teenagers cope when their parents have 'embarassing' jobs - not just those in the sex industry either. It's great how many moral people there are out there armed with stones and happy to throw them from their glass houses!
Re: Parents in porn
Peony wrote:
Wow, I never wanted to piss anyone off (bollocks my editor is not going to like this). All the comments are totally valid (shit I got rumbled) and I can assure you we're not out to exploit anyone (I can assure you we were out to exploit everyone). Of course we'd never err on the side of anything pornographic, or exploitative (unless it was going to be our biggest seller). Teen mags have to be so careful about anything that crosses that line (we got caught one and were fined ????'s) and as a journalist I'd never entertain the idea of putting my readers in that position (unless it got me the pulitzer prize). I can assure you it's not a mucky feature (I can assure you it's a mucky feature), it's about how teenagers cope when their parents have 'embarassing' jobs (you lot are a buncjh of saddo's) - not just those in the sex industry either (though we are not really interested in the local pub toilet cleaner). It's great how many moral people there are out there armed with stones and happy to throw them from their glass houses! (I lost the debate and can now only resort to flaming).
Wow, I never wanted to piss anyone off (bollocks my editor is not going to like this). All the comments are totally valid (shit I got rumbled) and I can assure you we're not out to exploit anyone (I can assure you we were out to exploit everyone). Of course we'd never err on the side of anything pornographic, or exploitative (unless it was going to be our biggest seller). Teen mags have to be so careful about anything that crosses that line (we got caught one and were fined ????'s) and as a journalist I'd never entertain the idea of putting my readers in that position (unless it got me the pulitzer prize). I can assure you it's not a mucky feature (I can assure you it's a mucky feature), it's about how teenagers cope when their parents have 'embarassing' jobs (you lot are a buncjh of saddo's) - not just those in the sex industry either (though we are not really interested in the local pub toilet cleaner). It's great how many moral people there are out there armed with stones and happy to throw them from their glass houses! (I lost the debate and can now only resort to flaming).
quis custodiet ipsos custodes