The site went down shortly after I posted last night before I could merged 8198 and Melanie [21] properly. 8198 has now been merged under Melanie [21].
Ideally we would go back to the originals of all the titles represented and check the aspect ratio. I suspect she does have a slightly longer face than the norm, but the Tracy Lords pics look unrealistic. The second one looks better, but I think this is because her head is tilted back.
If we don't have the originals, I would do the 540/576 trick once on the Melanie [21] pics, possibly twice in the case of the 8198 pics, but if we have any original videos, I would start there anyway and try to get an untilted headshot at the correct aspect ratio. Then adjust an untilted headshot in each title by the required amount if necessary and all other caps by the same amount for each title.
I've left Trracy Lords unmerged for the moment.
I hope that makes sense.
XNK8198 = Melanie [21]
Re: XNK8198 = Melanie [21]
Thanks a lot. They do look better, but see my other post which was made at the same time as yours.
Re: XNK8198 = Melanie [21]
alec wrote:
> Ideally we would go back to the originals of all the titles
> represented and check the aspect ratio.
Find uncropped images from Das frivole Mietshaus here and from Spritz Platsch here.
I think the AR in this images is ok.
The AR at the covers of Sex Club Madame P. here and an unlisted compilation here should be ok
and are probably helpful to get a feeling how she really looks.
>I suspect she does have
> a slightly longer face than the norm, but the Tracy Lords pics
> look unrealistic. The second one looks better, but I think this
> is because her head is tilted back.
Agree. The most odd images for Tracy Lords are the first and the third pic.
>
> If we don't have the originals, I would do the 540/576 trick
> once on the Melanie [21] pics, possibly twice in the case of
> the 8198 pics, but if we have any original videos, I would
> start there anyway and try to get an untilted headshot at the
> correct aspect ratio. Then adjust an untilted headshot in each
> title by the required amount if necessary and all other caps by
> the same amount for each title.
>
> I've left Trracy Lords unmerged for the moment.
>
> I hope that makes sense.
Not sure about the images of Sex Club Madame P., but that could be a
problem of the low quality of the images. All other images in Melanie's
gallery look ok to me, especially as the images of the other girls from this
films seems to be ok too.
> Ideally we would go back to the originals of all the titles
> represented and check the aspect ratio.
Find uncropped images from Das frivole Mietshaus here and from Spritz Platsch here.
I think the AR in this images is ok.
The AR at the covers of Sex Club Madame P. here and an unlisted compilation here should be ok
and are probably helpful to get a feeling how she really looks.
>I suspect she does have
> a slightly longer face than the norm, but the Tracy Lords pics
> look unrealistic. The second one looks better, but I think this
> is because her head is tilted back.
Agree. The most odd images for Tracy Lords are the first and the third pic.
>
> If we don't have the originals, I would do the 540/576 trick
> once on the Melanie [21] pics, possibly twice in the case of
> the 8198 pics, but if we have any original videos, I would
> start there anyway and try to get an untilted headshot at the
> correct aspect ratio. Then adjust an untilted headshot in each
> title by the required amount if necessary and all other caps by
> the same amount for each title.
>
> I've left Trracy Lords unmerged for the moment.
>
> I hope that makes sense.
Not sure about the images of Sex Club Madame P., but that could be a
problem of the low quality of the images. All other images in Melanie's
gallery look ok to me, especially as the images of the other girls from this
films seems to be ok too.
Re: XNK8198 = Melanie [21]
Thanks. Saved me a ton of tedious slog - I really only wanna do
the Fun things ; -0).
Pics replaced.
deezer wrote:
> Not sure about the images of Sex Club Madame P., but that could
> be a problem of the low quality of the images.
IIRC it was.
the Fun things ; -0).
Pics replaced.
deezer wrote:
> Not sure about the images of Sex Club Madame P., but that could
> be a problem of the low quality of the images.
IIRC it was.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."