Hi folks, again a Private Girl.
She appears in Triple X magazine no. 24, year 1998.
In the magazine say she's Vivienne, born in 1978 and appears in the movie "Pirate 7: Sex Club", but doing some cross-search I didn't find any match.
She has a distinctive horse tattoo over the left breast.
Any help?
Thanks in advance
[img]http://s2.postimg.org/vp7p08p2d/Clipboard_1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://s2.postimg.org/pzrgfxiw5/Clipboard_2.jpg[/img]
[img]http://s2.postimg.org/v9wf78351/Clipboard_3.jpg[/img]
Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
.
The girl in the inset in your first pic sure ain't her either; and whoever she
is, she ain't in P7.
Another stunning triumph for Private's knowledge of its own products.
Where do they get their staff from? Ikea?
The girl in the inset in your first pic sure ain't her either; and whoever she
is, she ain't in P7.
Another stunning triumph for Private's knowledge of its own products.
Where do they get their staff from? Ikea?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
JJ, you not being fair to Ikea staff.
I had looked at extensive thumbnails of that movie and
she was nowhere to be seen. I suspected maybe in bonus or
or trailers, but she was not in the movie.
I never really paid that much attention at that time to those performer "profiles".
It would not haver mattered that much, only a small fraction of
the Private output made it way to the local video shops. A lot of the shop owners or clients
had little appreciation for Private movies and apparently they were pricier that
the regular (US) porn fare.
I had looked at extensive thumbnails of that movie and
she was nowhere to be seen. I suspected maybe in bonus or
or trailers, but she was not in the movie.
I never really paid that much attention at that time to those performer "profiles".
It would not haver mattered that much, only a small fraction of
the Private output made it way to the local video shops. A lot of the shop owners or clients
had little appreciation for Private movies and apparently they were pricier that
the regular (US) porn fare.
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Len801 wrote:
> JJ, you not being fair to Ikea staff.
Well... the shop/cafe staff are Ok - but I want to kill the ones who pack six
screws when eight are required. 10 for 8 is fine, that's planning for attrition.
This is basic quality-control - so what's the problem?
> I never really paid that much attention at that time to those performer
> "profiles".
When you've had to disentangle as many Private cast-lists as I have, you'll
be carpet-bitingly insane about it too. I HATE it: it's sloppy and wholly
avoidable. I am resignedly comfortable with being despised by the people I
give my hard-earned cash to - it's having that attitude rammed down my throat
so demonstratively that infuriates [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/idontbelieveit.gif[/img]
> JJ, you not being fair to Ikea staff.
Well... the shop/cafe staff are Ok - but I want to kill the ones who pack six
screws when eight are required. 10 for 8 is fine, that's planning for attrition.
This is basic quality-control - so what's the problem?
> I never really paid that much attention at that time to those performer
> "profiles".
When you've had to disentangle as many Private cast-lists as I have, you'll
be carpet-bitingly insane about it too. I HATE it: it's sloppy and wholly
avoidable. I am resignedly comfortable with being despised by the people I
give my hard-earned cash to - it's having that attitude rammed down my throat
so demonstratively that infuriates [img]http://www.egafd.com/forum/smileys/idontbelieveit.gif[/img]
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Well, first of all, thanks, now I know who she is and yes, is (somehow) Vivienne.
Is hard to say but between "Pirate video 7" and "Triple X Files 7" there is more than a typo so, yes, Private staff those years perhaps worked part time looking naked girls and part time at a gas station or something.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I understood that you are saying the girl in the inset is not the same that the girl with the horses tattoo.
Well, I have the whole photoset and she is the same girl, sure. May be I can post more pictures.
If I misunderstood the phrase, so, my bad, nothing happened here.
R.
Is hard to say but between "Pirate video 7" and "Triple X Files 7" there is more than a typo so, yes, Private staff those years perhaps worked part time looking naked girls and part time at a gas station or something.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I understood that you are saying the girl in the inset is not the same that the girl with the horses tattoo.
Well, I have the whole photoset and she is the same girl, sure. May be I can post more pictures.
If I misunderstood the phrase, so, my bad, nothing happened here.
R.
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Rodrigombia wrote:
> Is hard to say but between "Pirate video 7" and "Triple X Files
> 7" there is more than a typo so, yes, Private staff those years
> perhaps worked part time looking naked girls and part time at a
> gas station or something.
The problems occur mainly with the older stuff, released originally on VHS.
They're much better now. I don't suppose they kept very accurate records
back then - and the legal requirements were much less strict, so it's perhaps
understandable - although they ought to have been honest and admit ignorance,
rather than guess and hence mislead.
> ....you are saying
> the girl in the inset is not the same that the girl with the horses tattoo.
It wouldn't be the first [or the 1000th] time I've been wrong. Serves me
right for making the claim on just the one photo. I'd be interested to see
some other pics, so we can try to IDi t.
> Is hard to say but between "Pirate video 7" and "Triple X Files
> 7" there is more than a typo so, yes, Private staff those years
> perhaps worked part time looking naked girls and part time at a
> gas station or something.
The problems occur mainly with the older stuff, released originally on VHS.
They're much better now. I don't suppose they kept very accurate records
back then - and the legal requirements were much less strict, so it's perhaps
understandable - although they ought to have been honest and admit ignorance,
rather than guess and hence mislead.
> ....you are saying
> the girl in the inset is not the same that the girl with the horses tattoo.
It wouldn't be the first [or the 1000th] time I've been wrong. Serves me
right for making the claim on just the one photo. I'd be interested to see
some other pics, so we can try to IDi t.
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Well, yes, I have to say that with just one photo one cannot be sure, you're right.
I copy-pasted the whole photoset but I don't know if its worth to post it complete (unless you wanted it).
I've just picked a couple of pics
The inset is a crop of this one
[img]http://s1.postimg.org/5qvtbjhcb/Clipboard_20.jpg[/img]
Next one is this one, compare the nose (with a delightful "tip splited")
[img]http://s9.postimg.org/78i4wbl6j/Clipboard_21.jpg[/img]
Finally the following one, with the horse tattoo and same jewellery (and nose)
[img]http://s18.postimg.org/vz8es265h/Clipboard_22.jpg[/img]
Extra pic: three shots with different pose, colour and smiles
[img]http://s10.postimg.org/5cl1ye6et/Clipboard_23.jpg[/img]
To me is the same, I don't know you.
Funny fact: the only time I remember a change of model in the middle of something was a movie with Deborah Wells in her still-don't-perform-anal ages (shooting on film) in which one scene has anal close-ups of a different girl, pubic hair don't lie hahaha
R.
I copy-pasted the whole photoset but I don't know if its worth to post it complete (unless you wanted it).
I've just picked a couple of pics
The inset is a crop of this one
[img]http://s1.postimg.org/5qvtbjhcb/Clipboard_20.jpg[/img]
Next one is this one, compare the nose (with a delightful "tip splited")
[img]http://s9.postimg.org/78i4wbl6j/Clipboard_21.jpg[/img]
Finally the following one, with the horse tattoo and same jewellery (and nose)
[img]http://s18.postimg.org/vz8es265h/Clipboard_22.jpg[/img]
Extra pic: three shots with different pose, colour and smiles
[img]http://s10.postimg.org/5cl1ye6et/Clipboard_23.jpg[/img]
To me is the same, I don't know you.
Funny fact: the only time I remember a change of model in the middle of something was a movie with Deborah Wells in her still-don't-perform-anal ages (shooting on film) in which one scene has anal close-ups of a different girl, pubic hair don't lie hahaha
R.
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Seeing those [notoriously hard-to-identify] close-in shots I don't feel quite
so bad now : -)
Weird fact: Viv seems to be one of the very few girls who worked for Private
who doesn't seem to be in any of the 'Private Castings X' series [or at any
rate, no such scene has yet been identified].
"Pseudo-anals" are rife - search here for many examples, the longest-running
IIRC being about Marilyn Jess and Brigitte Lahaie [in both cases: no, never,
nohow].
so bad now : -)
Weird fact: Viv seems to be one of the very few girls who worked for Private
who doesn't seem to be in any of the 'Private Castings X' series [or at any
rate, no such scene has yet been identified].
"Pseudo-anals" are rife - search here for many examples, the longest-running
IIRC being about Marilyn Jess and Brigitte Lahaie [in both cases: no, never,
nohow].
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Rolling theories, perhaps Woodman thought that her "casting scene" (quotation maks on purpose) wasn't so interesting to put into a tape or may be there wasn't casting after all, just a call to her agent ...
(like many of us think is in reality, since Casting is just an excuse of Pierre to pretend to be a pornstar, and fuck gorgeous girls in the mean time hahaha)
About "pseudo-anals", didn't find anything in the forum, could be my search, not so deep.
But what I do found is the movie with Deborah Wells and I made a mistake, wasn't a film movie.
I'm talking of Heidi 5: Heidi und die lustigen Spritzbugen der Berge hard to say the scene because are intermixed, but around the beginning.
(like many of us think is in reality, since Casting is just an excuse of Pierre to pretend to be a pornstar, and fuck gorgeous girls in the mean time hahaha)
About "pseudo-anals", didn't find anything in the forum, could be my search, not so deep.
But what I do found is the movie with Deborah Wells and I made a mistake, wasn't a film movie.
I'm talking of Heidi 5: Heidi und die lustigen Spritzbugen der Berge hard to say the scene because are intermixed, but around the beginning.
Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Rodrigombia wrote:
> Rolling theories, perhaps Woodman thought that her "casting
> scene" (quotation maks on purpose) wasn't so interesting ...
I mentioned this partly in the hope that one of our visitors who also frequents
the Wood Man site might have better info; or might just ask him.
> (like many of us think is in reality, since Casting is just an
> excuse of Pierre to pretend to be a pornstar, and fuck gorgeous
> girls in the mean time hahaha)
I've frequently been extremely rude about the unwatchability and
pointlessness of these scenes : -)
>
> About "pseudo-anals", didn't find anything in the forum, could
> be my search, not so deep.
Try '[actress of your choice] faked anal'. Or 'body double'.
> But what I do found is the movie with Deborah Wells and I made
> a mistake, wasn't a film movie.
> I'm talking of Heidi 5: Heidi und die lustigen Spritzbugen der Berge
Ah yes, I remember it well. One of the most comical fakings ever. Because
Deb was [not entirely understandably, IMO] very popular, directors quite
often tried to insert an 'anal' into her performances. For me, I'd rather
watch her in her heyday, with that weirdly-alluring 3/4-cut bush, than
see her do those three last-gasp real anals with her face like a bag of
spanners and her body-language screaming "noooooooooooo....".
> Rolling theories, perhaps Woodman thought that her "casting
> scene" (quotation maks on purpose) wasn't so interesting ...
I mentioned this partly in the hope that one of our visitors who also frequents
the Wood Man site might have better info; or might just ask him.
> (like many of us think is in reality, since Casting is just an
> excuse of Pierre to pretend to be a pornstar, and fuck gorgeous
> girls in the mean time hahaha)
I've frequently been extremely rude about the unwatchability and
pointlessness of these scenes : -)
>
> About "pseudo-anals", didn't find anything in the forum, could
> be my search, not so deep.
Try '[actress of your choice] faked anal'. Or 'body double'.
> But what I do found is the movie with Deborah Wells and I made
> a mistake, wasn't a film movie.
> I'm talking of Heidi 5: Heidi und die lustigen Spritzbugen der Berge
Ah yes, I remember it well. One of the most comical fakings ever. Because
Deb was [not entirely understandably, IMO] very popular, directors quite
often tried to insert an 'anal' into her performances. For me, I'd rather
watch her in her heyday, with that weirdly-alluring 3/4-cut bush, than
see her do those three last-gasp real anals with her face like a bag of
spanners and her body-language screaming "noooooooooooo....".
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."