I was wondering about the original (French) title of the following Olinka movie, German title "Marilyn bizarre Herrin" (Mike Hunter, VHS cover), although the on-screen title is Bizarre Marilyn. (And, no, it's not Melodie pour Manuela).
Story: Olinka runs a clinic for people with a disturbed sex life, apparently in the former office of a divorce lawyer. Her staff are Dominique St. Clair, Laura Clair (neither of whom seems to participate in the sex), and Marianne Aubert. Amongst her clients are Christoph Clark and his wife, Cathy Menard - who gets regularly beaten up, because CC likes his sex rather rough.
We also have Marilyn Jess dressed up as an angel, Jean-Pierre Armand, Andre Kay, Gabriel Pontello, etc.
Quite a few scenes are likely to be archive material, because the clinic has a store room full of porn tapes, which are sometimes shown to us, and it is not always clear when.
which Olinka movie?
-
stefano romantico
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: which Olinka movie?
From B's original post:
"And, no, it's not Melodie pour Manuela" : -))
"And, no, it's not Melodie pour Manuela" : -))
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
beutelwolf
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: which Olinka movie?
jj wrote:
> From B's original post:
> "And, no, it's not Melodie pour Manuela" : -))
Indeed. The reason I said that is that I have that one too and so I know they are not the same.
There is no mountain lodge, no Cathy Stewart, no Catherine Ringer.
But there are lots of nurses outfits, there is C.Clark taking a woman on the bonnet of a car while somebody sprays them with water; in another scene, CC is crying like a toddler in a toddler-cage (the proper word escapes me at the moment) until 'mum' comes along to suck him off - and at the same time she is taken from behind by JP Armand.
> From B's original post:
> "And, no, it's not Melodie pour Manuela" : -))
Indeed. The reason I said that is that I have that one too and so I know they are not the same.
There is no mountain lodge, no Cathy Stewart, no Catherine Ringer.
But there are lots of nurses outfits, there is C.Clark taking a woman on the bonnet of a car while somebody sprays them with water; in another scene, CC is crying like a toddler in a toddler-cage (the proper word escapes me at the moment) until 'mum' comes along to suck him off - and at the same time she is taken from behind by JP Armand.
Re: which Olinka movie?
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
beutelwolf
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: which Olinka movie?
jj wrote:
> I assume you've already discounted
> this?
> It does sound awfully similar to your description......
No, I had not seen that. That's a match! Thanks.
But it still is without a French title then...
I'm not so sure though that the only sex with Cathy Menard is in the archive footage, but that's difficult to separate from the main picture (which is mostly a framing story). Also I didn't recall Nadine Roussial. XNK0563 is in fact shown in that mentioned scene on the car bonnet.
> I assume you've already discounted
> this?
> It does sound awfully similar to your description......
No, I had not seen that. That's a match! Thanks.
But it still is without a French title then...
I'm not so sure though that the only sex with Cathy Menard is in the archive footage, but that's difficult to separate from the main picture (which is mostly a framing story). Also I didn't recall Nadine Roussial. XNK0563 is in fact shown in that mentioned scene on the car bonnet.
Re: which Olinka movie?
4WIW I've signally failed to source a copy of that [or 'this', if you
prefer].
Good hunting : -)
prefer].
Good hunting : -)
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
beutelwolf
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: which Olinka movie?
jj wrote:
> 4WIW I've signally failed to source a copy of that [or 'this',
> if you
> prefer].
> Good hunting : -)
signally?
Although it's not the same edition as mine I reckon auction 3006129 on filmundo is the same flick, as the back cover shows these nurses outfits. [IMG]http://img111.imagevenue.com/loc160/th_ ... 160lo.jpeg[/IMG]
> 4WIW I've signally failed to source a copy of that [or 'this',
> if you
> prefer].
> Good hunting : -)
signally?
Although it's not the same edition as mine I reckon auction 3006129 on filmundo is the same flick, as the back cover shows these nurses outfits. [IMG]http://img111.imagevenue.com/loc160/th_ ... 160lo.jpeg[/IMG]
Re: which Olinka movie?
beutelwolf wrote:
> signally?
Conspicuously or especially.
Failure is to me the tomato ketchup in the sausage-sandwich of Life : -(
> signally?
Conspicuously or especially.
Failure is to me the tomato ketchup in the sausage-sandwich of Life : -(
"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
signification...."
-
beutelwolf
- Posts: 1210
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: which Olinka movie?
jj wrote:
> beutelwolf wrote:
> > signally?
>
> Conspicuously or especially.
> Failure is to me the tomato ketchup in the sausage-sandwich of
> Life : -(
Not really a very conspicuous example in Olinka's filmo, considering the abundance of archive material, but I suppose if you're an Olinka-completist...
> beutelwolf wrote:
> > signally?
>
> Conspicuously or especially.
> Failure is to me the tomato ketchup in the sausage-sandwich of
> Life : -(
Not really a very conspicuous example in Olinka's filmo, considering the abundance of archive material, but I suppose if you're an Olinka-completist...