Tracey Adams.

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of Continental European female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
mark shanon
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by mark shanon »

>She has not done any

To be so categorical one should have established all of her filmography. Which (as far as I know) nobody has, expecially regarding her italian forays.
You can say it's highly improbable, not impossible: absolute truths have no validity in porn.
frenchlover
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by frenchlover »

Her filmography (under construction)


FL
mark shanon
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by mark shanon »

(under construction)
Len801
Posts: 3373
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by Len801 »

Yes, It is a filmo I have been working on, for some time now.
I have been busy on other things, I had been promised some assistance (which has not materialized for a variety of reasons), and there have been problems with the server at SZ forum which has derailed the completion of the filmography on a number of occasions.
On top of that, Tracey does not appear to much like discussing her hard-core past/films [rest of post removed by mod].
mark shanon
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by mark shanon »

>and there have been problems with the server at SZ forum which has derailed the completion of the filmography

So you're serious about giving a "complete" filmography? OK, we'll see.
mark shanon
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by mark shanon »

But the question is: how do you establish the "completion" of a filmography of a porn-star?
Len801
Posts: 3373
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by Len801 »

Mark, do I detect a certain sense of ridicule?
I have done a lot of filmos in that forum (which I consider quite complete, with US and euro titles, as well as soft core movies), and I have worked on the Deborah Wells one with The Colonel which is more complete than the one at IAFD and EGAFD Database.
Is there a particular reason why you don't think it is possible, or at least do fair justice to this popular actress?
I usually work alone and with very limited resources, on my spare time. No one pays me to do it, so I am a little puzzled by your remark. If you or any other have information to offer which may be helpful to bring this project to a sufficiently satisfactory conclusion, I would be most pleased to receive it, and I am very ready to acknowledge any substantial contribution.
I am not stingy with any information gathered, the link to her filmo has been provided to the MSN Tracy Adams shrine page, and I have frequently shared the filmos and other general information to the moderators of this forum (Alec will confirm this).
The filmos found at the Super Zeta forum are freely and easily accessible by anyone. You don't even need to regiser to read their content.
Len801
Posts: 3373
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by Len801 »

Mark,
I consider a filmo "complete" when I have exhausted all possible and practical searches regarding a certain title (released in the US and abroad), date of production/release, production/distributor name, cast names, plotline, what type of scene she performed and with whom (anal, DP, etc), whether there is a on-line review for that film, whether there are on-line sites that offer the movie for sale, and of course finding the ever elusive video box covers which is the most time consuming portion of putting all the material together.
One can never be complete, of course, and if other information is later located, the filmo is duly updated, as Alec does for this forum.
digi1874
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by digi1874 »

Len,

Keep up the good work!!!!!

Digi
mark shanon
Posts: 685
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Tracey Adams.

Post by mark shanon »

>One can never be complete, of course,


So how can you affirm with absolute certainty that a performer never practiced a certain sexual variation? Why not using words like "unlikely", "improbable" and so on when talking about porn? I think it would be more correct.
Post Reply