err..Flossie?
wasn't w Marie Forsa so probably was
dunno it's danish title, was a doublebill w Fanny Hill.
on SWV or ABA...
since tape was 2 hours long,and imdb states round 80 min.each,i assume they're cut.
thx anyway,zushiomaru
Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
-
mark shanon
- Posts: 685
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
The Flossie you're referring to was an american early '70's production, double billed on the ABA edition with Fanny Hill, both starring very pretty (I personally prefer her to Forsa) Carmel Monterey. But the correct title is "Flossie, a Venus of 15" (no fear, there: miss Monterey was well into her twenties). Can't tell for sure whether is cut, but I don't think so.
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
mulholand wrote:
It got a very favourable review in Playboy (I forget which issue).
>
Found it. Here goes:
"Flossie is director Bert Torn's literate modern-dress version of an English underground novel written (by one Jack Archer) back in 1810.
Promoted as ?the most beautiful erotic fantasy ever? and already challenging ?Emmanuelle? as a box-office phenomenon abroad, ?Flossie? lives up to it's blurbs with exquisite photography, pretty people and a spate of soft-core but fully consummated sexcapades more romantic than raunchy.
????Performer Jack Frank - who looks like a young Joseph Cotten, even with his clothes off - plays a guy named Jack, who is invited by a worldly old flame to tutor her virginal blonde prot?g?e in the arts of love. In the film's title role, Maria Lynn is the freshest little porn queen since Marilyn Chambers and excudes a Sweetheart of Sigma Chi innocence that makes her thirst for sexual knowledge seem both natural and disarming.
????You don't have to be a swinging Swede to read between the lines of ?Flossie?'s frequent narration, which is intense, explicit and proper accompaniment to images made to tease the eye with intimate details that most sex-movies rush through in their haste to reach a splashy climax. Torn uses flashbacks to cover the obligatory orgies and lesbian sequences but keeps ?Flossie? thrumming along seductively as well as subjectively - until every man jack of us begins to root for the hero to archive maximum penetration.
???? Seldom has this primal need been depicted on the screen with such wholesome spirit and zest. Another forward step in making smut utterly respectable."
- From Playboy Magazine, August 1975.
Someone recently asked:
"Why did here so lot of bad quality 70's Movies because the best Movies did in 90's and do now"
This is why.
These days there are just too few Joseph Cotten look-alikes around...
It got a very favourable review in Playboy (I forget which issue).
>
Found it. Here goes:
"Flossie is director Bert Torn's literate modern-dress version of an English underground novel written (by one Jack Archer) back in 1810.
Promoted as ?the most beautiful erotic fantasy ever? and already challenging ?Emmanuelle? as a box-office phenomenon abroad, ?Flossie? lives up to it's blurbs with exquisite photography, pretty people and a spate of soft-core but fully consummated sexcapades more romantic than raunchy.
????Performer Jack Frank - who looks like a young Joseph Cotten, even with his clothes off - plays a guy named Jack, who is invited by a worldly old flame to tutor her virginal blonde prot?g?e in the arts of love. In the film's title role, Maria Lynn is the freshest little porn queen since Marilyn Chambers and excudes a Sweetheart of Sigma Chi innocence that makes her thirst for sexual knowledge seem both natural and disarming.
????You don't have to be a swinging Swede to read between the lines of ?Flossie?'s frequent narration, which is intense, explicit and proper accompaniment to images made to tease the eye with intimate details that most sex-movies rush through in their haste to reach a splashy climax. Torn uses flashbacks to cover the obligatory orgies and lesbian sequences but keeps ?Flossie? thrumming along seductively as well as subjectively - until every man jack of us begins to root for the hero to archive maximum penetration.
???? Seldom has this primal need been depicted on the screen with such wholesome spirit and zest. Another forward step in making smut utterly respectable."
- From Playboy Magazine, August 1975.
Someone recently asked:
"Why did here so lot of bad quality 70's Movies because the best Movies did in 90's and do now"
This is why.
These days there are just too few Joseph Cotten look-alikes around...
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
[url=http://www.bcult.it][b]B CULT[/b][/url]
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
[url=http://www.bcult.it][b]B CULT[/b][/url]
Another "Flossie"
I don't have this video from Alpha Blue Archives.
But all the ones I do have on its double features are three-reelers: i.e. Less than or equal to 66 minutes. {So it crams two movies on a T-120 or T-130.}
There is also the possibility that its print is missing a few minutes here or there, not due to any editing, but the quality of its print.
But all the ones I do have on its double features are three-reelers: i.e. Less than or equal to 66 minutes. {So it crams two movies on a T-120 or T-130.}
There is also the possibility that its print is missing a few minutes here or there, not due to any editing, but the quality of its print.
“Pornography is beautiful.” - Lassé Braun
-
igorfxhush
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
I have this movie in swedish, ... a good movie with a X scene by Marie Forsa... but according to me not a "masterpiece"... but quite watchable 
Re: Marie Fors?'s "Flossie"
In my opinion not 'watchable' only, but nearly a masterpiece
[url=http://www.bcult.it][b]B CULT[/b][/url]