Peepshow Specials

[Remington Steel]

I produced this series for Private for two years but this is now at an end. It seems to have been a popular show, so I am now producing a new series, more daring, all new girls but the same great sex. This series will be called 'The Pussy Prowler' and will include some special stuff shot with ultra low light cameras actually in 'peeping and dogging' spots. If anyone knows any good spots, lovers lanes, quiet car parks etc. please send details via e-mail, not in the forum or everyone will have been frightened away before I get there! Your reward will be a free vid.
Rem

[Newagent69]

Is this legal? Won't you get arrested? Shouldn't you just leave them alone? Will you be wearing your mac? Shouldn't you get a life?

[Webmaster]

Get A Life....What does this mean?
Remington Steel probably has a far better life than you...If it wasnt for people like him..people like you would not be able to buy whatever turns you on..
Everybody to their own thing...

The thing is if people do it in car parks etc they are fair game for peeping toms, voyeurs etc....and thousands of people love to watch the goings on...
I look forward to seeing the vids and the stills...

[Remington Steel]

Yawwwwnnnnn!

[Matt]

Hang on a minute guys. Each to their own, maybe. But the least you can expect when you buy a vid is that the people in them have consented to be on them. Don't want to rain on your little parade, but it is indeed illegal (and just a poor idea)

Say if you were spending an intimate moment with your girlfriend then discovered it on an 'adult tape'... you could sue the makers without any problems at all.

I totally agree each for their own, and only wish we could all be more honest, however this kind of 'anything goes' philosophy foes come with consequences - that being that not EVERYTHING is good.

[Steve]

Am I daft or are these crazy posts to Remington's question utter shit I a
m sure Remingtons post is honest

[joey]

I don't think Remington is proposing actual voyeurism, just a simulation, in an appropriate location. If you seriously thought the former, you must be a bit naive or slow on the uptake, I think.

Have a look at the Peepshow specials themselves. I suppose he *could* just have bumped into Laura Turner and Kris Knight on the occasion of their first meeting, and somehow followed them into the dunes and filmed them without their knowledge, but somehow it seems a little more plausible to assume they were paid and it was all arranged. (Sorry if I disillusion anyone, here.

Now think: do you suppose he could have any slightly more sensible reasons for not wanting people to post these locations on this forum?

[Remington Steel]

Thanks Joey! You got the idea, some slow ones around though..

[woodgnome]

psuedo voyeurism seems a bit pointless really. it gives you something to hang your storyline on but it's no different to any other scene setting device.

unless it's being done for real (which i couldn't possibly condone, of course) there's nothing exciting about seeing someone acting the part of a voyeur. the thrill of spying on someone is located in the fact that it's actually taking place.

sorry to be a wet blanket but there you go!

[Matt]

I agree. Sorry for being "slow on the uptake" - these days anything goes in porn, and nothing in your message made it particularly obvious you were intending to produce a tape of you faking it. Maybe you could be clearer in the future now you know us "slow ones" are out there!