Hitler vs Stalin

A place to socialise and share opinions with other members of the BGAFD Community.
Carausius
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Hitler vs Stalin

Post by Carausius »

A very serious topic indeed. I think jj gave us a good hint: "Stalin killed undiscriminately". Hitler had more specific targets: Jews, commies, freemasons etc. Stalin probably did not wish to start a war; his army was simply not prepared for it. Hitler deliberately prepared a war of aggression.
On the other side, in Hitler's Germany the "ordinary people" (if I dare say) were quite free; in Stalin's Russia, everybody was a potential suspect.
During WWII, we were "Uncle Joe's" allies, and there are even a few Hoolywood movies singing his praise (I think of "Mission to Moscow" for instance). And it's true that, without Russia, victory over Germany would have been very, very difficult.
IMHO, Hitler is still worse than Stalin, which doesn't make him a good man, just a tiny little bit "less worse" than the other, so to speak.
steve56
Posts: 13579
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by steve56 »

stalin wasnt stalin when he sent that russian bear in.
Pervert
Posts: 10396
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by Pervert »

It's like arguing who's the best between Fred West and Peter Sutcliffe. Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pot, Saddam, Mugabe, Amin, Duvalier. Bokosa and any other evil fucker responsible for millions of deaths----they are the worst of mankind, and proof that all that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

As a race, we should be aspiring to be the best we can; instead, we tend to lionise the worst.
Pervert
The Worlds Biggest Collector Of Ben Dover DVD`s
Koppite Till I Die
Remember - You`ll Never Walk Alone
BeestonBoy
Posts: 1250
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by BeestonBoy »

Hmmmm or another way of putting it is,that they were both Nuttier than squirel shit!!

They were both self deluded to the extreme!! This was at least in part to the fact that no one around them dared question any of thier actions for fear of the shadow of suspsion falling on them and getting that knock on the door in the middle of the night.

They both believed that they could make their country stronger by killing millions. Who they chose as the "enemy" has no bearing on their actions what so ever.


Cheers

BB

'I see the usual gang of misfits and dope addicts are here'
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by jj »

Caractacus wrote:
> As a race, we should be aspiring to be the best we can;
> instead, we tend to lionise the worst.

C4 bore that last bit firmly in mind when they commissioned BB.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by jj »

Carausius wrote:
> Stalin probably did not
> wish to start a war; his army was simply not prepared for it.

Stalin only ever trusted one man: Hitler.
When his generals informed him that 'Barbarossa' had begun Joe was
apparently in a state of total denial and blue funk [this from his personal
valet Poskryobyshev's recollection].
For a moment he even thought that the [in reality, completely petrified]
officers had come to arrest him !
Stalin never trusted anyone again...

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Bigshow
Posts: 207
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by Bigshow »

Hattie Jacques Vs Sid James

Keep it real lads.
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by Sam Slater »

At least a leader can look upon their actions in a sterilised way. Hitler never smelt the burning bodies, or watched camp prisoners die of frostbite. He -and Stalin- only saw pieces of paper, and statistics.

I wonder if these evil dictators would have been so enthusiastic if they'd had to do the dirty work themselves (like Saddam did on occasion)?

I think there's definite -purposeful- psychological detachment going on when it comes to genocide. There has to be unless you're just plainly sociopathic - and if you're sociopathic, how can you be truly evil?

Can anyone be truly evil? What is evil? Always hard questions to answer!

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by jj »

Sam Slater wrote:

> if you're sociopathic,
> how can you be truly evil?
> Can anyone be truly evil? What is evil? Always hard questions
> to answer!
>

Good point. Of course that doesn't stop us defining their deeds as evil.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
Sam Slater
Posts: 11624
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Hitler vs Stalin

Post by Sam Slater »

True, true.

Anyone can commit an evil act, but to 'be' truly evil is, I feel, impossible.

[i]I used to spend a lot of time criticizing Islam on here in the noughties - but things are much better now.[/i]
Locked