Onlyfans - reviews

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
satch9
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by satch9 »

its getting too much, I agree.

is there a way to feedback this sort of thing without doing it on th efees and risking getting flamed
IainT
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by IainT »

My guess is that most of the girls simply cannot make anything worthwhile at $20 per sub or whatever.

Add to this the fact most do not have the patience to realise that something like OF is a medium to long term project which needs constant work/updates several times a day to make it viable. And also a few fail to realise you can only con the fans so often with false promises.

I would think the ones who are constantly active and have reduced to a nominal sub like $10 but then charge extra for anything worthwhile are the ones making some decent money.

Only a small percentage of subscribers will pay $50 or $100 for something but then it only needs a few people to spend $100 and if the model is providing what she says she will rather than trying it on, then those few people may we?ll spend quite a few $100?s every month.

And if she can get a dozen guys to bite every time she posts something for $25 and she does that several times per month...
boobs4hot
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by boobs4hot »

nice list

~~~~~~~~~~

[url=https://www.britainsgotbabes.com/]British Babes[/url]
satch9
Posts: 764
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by satch9 »

valid points iain.

I just baulk at Sophia blake this week for example, offering purchasable content for over ?100 this week alone on top of the subscription.

it smacks of hubris at times but like you say, if 5 guys do it, that is a pretty good living per month
leatherpantsman
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by leatherpantsman »

It is annoying when there is a suggestion of some bg content for example using the word "dick" and then finding out that the dick is actually a toy!!! To be fair there is some interesting content on there but sometimes they don't half make you work hard for it. It doesn't help that some people can save the vids etc and then out them on places like pornhub so the girls get pissed off cos that means they're not going to be making as much money. But sometimes when they ask for $100 for a 50 second vid where you don't know what you're getting, can you blame the guy for making it widely available. Interesting business model though, lol.
Simon Craig
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Simon Craig »

Imogen Whitely aka Sophia Reynolds aka Chloe Morley

Has anyone signed up to this model ?
She used to be and before that

worth a subscription?

photo_man69
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by photo_man69 »

Ditching JodieEllen's because I'm noticing that the monthly cost is for censored/dull content and then you're spammed with messages asking you to pay for vaguely worded content that you can't preview to see if it's worth it.
Fuck that for a lark!
linseylover
Posts: 181
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by linseylover »

Any info on Sophie Louise 22 on onlyfans? Is she worth signing up for? Thanks
DaveZ
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by DaveZ »



For anyone who enjoyed seeing Adele on Only Tease she now has an only fans page
Tchocky
Posts: 122
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Onlyfans - reviews

Post by Tchocky »

Her onlyfans page is tamer than most models' twitter feeds; I wouldn't bother.
Post Reply