Michelle Thorne and two guys scene

[VintageTog]

one eyed jack wrote:

> No Randy Andy its you guys getting into a tizzy about nothing
> until it happens. You have a date You can all fight about it
> after then if it doesnt happen on time.
>
> Every Star Wars fan knows the new film comes out December the
> 8th 2015. If they dont see it come out that day then they can
> tear up the streets all they want. Until then...
>
> Stay Calm. Its only a porno
>
>

Not sure about Star Wars but she certainly has R2 - D2 type tits.

[cockneygeezer2009]

Well all this arguing means lots of publicity for Michelle. Will she. Won't she and if she doesn't i assume some punters will be a bit miffed.

[Emac]

cockneygeezer2009 wrote:

> Well all this arguing means lots of publicity for Michelle.
> Will she. Won't she and if she doesn't i assume some punters
> will be a bit miffed.
>
>
The received wisdom is that no publicity is bad publicity. People who believe that have probably never heard of Gerald Ratner!

In this internet and social media age, it's much harder to deceive people than it was in the previous decades of British porn, where there was so much pretence, much of it already referenced in this thread.
Lathered a world of difference between creating suspense and leaving people wondering what's coming up, compared to 'I'm shooting with 2 cocks on Saturday! First time ever!!', devoid of any sort of detail about whether it presents what is implied.
It would be easy enough to clarify, and the lack of clarification strengthens the likelihood that this will be a damp squib.

[Emac]

Sadly this forum doesn't allow later correction of typos, caused by touchscreen devices or fat fingers! It should have said 'there is a world of difference'!

[johnsmith09]

We're in an age where you can see an actual girl next door fucking on camera and for free on of the many swingers websites and where even professionally shot scenes are easily accessible and also free to even the computer illiterate. So it's no surprise that the industry veterans on this thread are still resorting to such desperate measures.

[one eyed jack]

Randy Andy wrote:

People then asked / got stroppy etc. about what exactly was shown and as per usual the industry rallied against those complaining instead of saying yes they probably do have a valid point lets stop it


Any examples you can quote where the industry rallied against those complaining? I rarely ever see the industry response to anything. Not sure count as one man ddoe not a busness make but apart from myself I rarely see if anyone complaining of validity in the business as everyone wants to believe if they keep their heads down ATVOD spies and snitches on here wont notice them

[johnsmith09]

@Jack: Are you drunk? Because your post makes no sense and especially the second paragraph.

[Emac]

johnsmith09 wrote:

> @Jack: Are you drunk? Because your post makes no sense and
> especially the second paragraph.

Thought it was just me!

[Michelle Thorne XXX]

You've only gotta wait 12 days now!

I'm shooting another one this weekend!

Michelle Thorne

[VintageTog]

one eyed jack wrote:

> Randy Andy wrote:
>
> People then asked / got stroppy etc. about what exactly was
> shown and as per usual the industry rallied against those
> complaining instead of saying yes they probably do have a valid
> point lets stop it
>
>
> Any examples you can quote where the industry rallied against
> those complaining? I rarely ever see the industry response to
> anything. Not sure count as one man ddoe not a busness make
> but apart from myself I rarely see if anyone complaining of
> validity in the business as everyone wants to believe if they
> keep their heads down ATVOD spies and snitches on here wont
> notice them
>
>

They all rallied together Del & Rodney style to put bogus non UK addresses on their sites? lol