Which is why you should always seek id for any shoot
No id? No shoot!
Protects you from shooting someone under age by accident and also subsequently bullshitting about there age to undermine legitimate work
Kayla Louise b/g?
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
On second thought, I doubt that the photographer, being the one putting it online and selling it through adultwork, would have done this kind of shoot without seeing the proper id.
The "I was only 17" probably has more to do with making sure other people won't share the photos.
Most likely she offered the tog money or another shoot to take the photos down.
The "I was only 17" probably has more to do with making sure other people won't share the photos.
Most likely she offered the tog money or another shoot to take the photos down.
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
GTF wrote:
> Which is why you should always seek id for any shoot
>
> No id? No shoot!
>
> Protects you from shooting someone under age by accident and
> also subsequently bullshitting about there age to undermine
> legitimate work
I totally agree, and I agree with those saying it is probably an attempt on her part to get rid of the photo, rather than a real case of her being under age. However, who'd want to be the one standing in the dock trying to prove that? Only the tog and the model (maybe just the model) know if she really was 17, but even a modicum of doubt ought to be enough to warn us off this particular shoot.
> Which is why you should always seek id for any shoot
>
> No id? No shoot!
>
> Protects you from shooting someone under age by accident and
> also subsequently bullshitting about there age to undermine
> legitimate work
I totally agree, and I agree with those saying it is probably an attempt on her part to get rid of the photo, rather than a real case of her being under age. However, who'd want to be the one standing in the dock trying to prove that? Only the tog and the model (maybe just the model) know if she really was 17, but even a modicum of doubt ought to be enough to warn us off this particular shoot.
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
I believe that she did a bit of pissing before so b/g isnt such a big thing and it must be out there - I guess she has realised that it keeps guys wanting more not going the whole deal.... lol
[Edited by moderator]
[Edited by moderator]
-
Grasshopper
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Kayla Louise b/g?
he had a video below about her urinating
Naughty piss outdoors
http://www.adultwork.com/ViewLibrary.as ... 976x272974
[img]http://92.48.193.20/m/272978.jpg[/image]
[Edited by moderator]
Naughty piss outdoors
http://www.adultwork.com/ViewLibrary.as ... 976x272974
[img]http://92.48.193.20/m/272978.jpg[/image]
[Edited by moderator]
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
You don't wanna know what it is if you don't know already!
I heard the same off another well known model, but I've never seen such footage or pics - probably only for private collectors - they can keep it lol
I heard the same off another well known model, but I've never seen such footage or pics - probably only for private collectors - they can keep it lol
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
Why would ANYONE want to be in the presence of another human having a sh1t, much less to film or photograph it?
Re: Kayla Louise b/g?
horses for courses mate - small market but if it earns ?????? - Didnt Alexis May do some shitting for films?