photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
jj
Posts: 28236
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by jj »

'Primary intention' might be the ideal but it's not what counts- it's what the
viewer perceives, or decides to perceive.
I can't remember the name of that artist who photographed all those naked
kiddies, but despite his protestations that the shots were 'art' he was howled
down by a very vocal minority who saw them as smut.

A similar discussion of the issue, from a pro-am site.

"a harmless drudge, that busies himself in tracing the original, and detailing the
signification...."
peejay101
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by peejay101 »

How does bringing "naked kiddies" into this help the debate?

I dont know who you mean, but if the OP had asked about whether he should take shots of "naked kiddies" in the name of art, then I would have suggested he wants his head testing.
spider
Posts: 2384
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by spider »

PeeJay, you said ?There are lots of examples of under 18's appearing topless/nude in mainstream media.?

I'm still waiting for you to list examples.
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by joe king »

'A lingerie model in a catalogue is not sexual as its primary intention'
What has that got to do with anything? Intention doesn't mean anything (in this case). Extreme porn law has something about 'primary intention' but indecent is indecent. You can't prove it's not indecent.

~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
peejay101
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by peejay101 »

You didn't ask me did you?

Anyway, here's 2 off the top of my head.....

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/showbiz/a ... y-harry.do

Thora Birch was topless in American Beauty at 16/17.

I'm sure there are plenty more, but these 2 are the highest profile ones I can remember.
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by joe king »

Would you say that they are sexual images?

~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
peejay101
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by peejay101 »

Doesn't matter if they are Joe. Legally, it only matters if they are 'indecent'.

Do you consider them indecent?
jamesr
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by jamesr »

Quite alarming the amount of interest this post has raised (me included!).

In essence, if anyone's getting off on the idea that 17 is taboo & therefore a turn-on, they shoud get their head tested. Surely it's about consent, beauty, content AND staying within the law that counts? Not age.

JamesR
spider
Posts: 2384
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by spider »

I think JJ has summed up the answer to this in the best possible way

"He'd probably be OK, but it's easy to offer idealistic counsel
when you don't have to face any consequences should it go wrong".

And there's every chance it will go wrong, because he's not a big US corporation producing a mainstream film, or a West End Theatre producing a "Artistic? play.
joe king
Posts: 6789
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: photographing a 17 year old in lingerie

Post by joe king »

Only a jury can tell.

~~~~~joe king~~~~~
Free pics and movie links of British porn stars
Latest British porn links: [b][url]http://british-uk-porn.com/blog/[/url][/b]
Post Reply