Why the sexstation daytime stream still censured?

[mrA]

OK, this is what I really can't understand. I have kind of just covered this in the other Sexstation post, but I would love to know why?

I am just completely puzzled to be honest and

Most of the girls spend most of the time at a side on view to the camera, right now I think it is Kittykatt on, and although she is showing some pussy from the side and a little from the front, when she lays head on to the camera, she has her hand covering it up. And now Jada is on she is covering up too.

For years, these channels blame ofcom and even on the day stream when there is no control over what they show, they seem to still be censuring the show.

Sexstation TV, can you tell me why she has to cover her pussy when the stream is not going out on TV? I'm sorry but I really don't understand???


Why can't you show open leg shots on the web???

[andytee]

because it proberbly recorded from an earlier show

[michaeldon1]

I think there is another camera for the subscribers,and the action is directed to this....

[mrA]

About the camera thing, that is what I thought. But there is no extra service for members apart from greenroom and it is not that.

And, then why when the girls face the stream camera head on do they cover their pussy's?

And it is not recorded, it is different everyday.

Look the question is this, why put a new service on the web where there is no censuring, allow girls to go fully naked and then censure them anyway? It just makes no sense!!!!

I know Sexstation post here, maybe they can shed some light on why...I mean there might be an explanation, but at the moment I am at a loss to what that might be.

[NeilUK]

Maybe the girls in question don't want to show it all. It will depend on the model Sex Station have adult models and Glamour only models who don't do full frontal. Or maybe it is just because its the free show

[mrA]

"Maybe the girls in question don't want to show it all. It will depend on the model Sex Station have adult models and Glamour only models who don't do full frontal. Or maybe it is just because its the free show"

Jada used to show more on Babestar, Twinkle has done hard girl/girl Lesbian and Kittykat has done up to girl/girl too.

OK, so it is a free livehsow, why go naked if they are not going to show you everything? It seems kind of strange to me.

Fair enough if they were to keep it covered until they were on a call, but people pay one pound fifty a minute to talk to a girl who they ussualy see on TV with censuring and now it has no censuring and they still can not get to see what they really want....

How is that fair??

[KALEL]

I totally agree with mrA, i don't get it either. I know that its a free service but they should really be showing and doing more. I thought that the whole idea of the show was to show more stuff then you could do on tv, its really cool that they can show there boobs in the daytime, but apart from that its not really that much different to the stuff they do on the late shows. I agree with mrA on that people have been complaining on rules that ofcom have laid down on what they can do over the tv is one matter, but when ever i watched the live streams they keep going on about that the rules over the net are different so they can pretty much do anything they want, but thing is they don't which does make it a little disappointing in there claims, nor can can still hear whats being said unless you ring in to hear what there saying. I know on live tv shows they have said they can't broadcast what's being said on the tv which is fair enough, but why not over the net? I know that at after 8.30 pm they broadcast the shows from the tv which are censured, but the before that time they really shouldn't be. At the end of end day i respect the fact that is a free broadcast, but they can do better then that.

[Jacques]

It's simple really.

Show nothing and then someone gives a quick glimpse. what happens? That's right everyone posts on here "phwoar did you see so-and-so's gash, hope there is more" and then everybody goes to watch in the vain hope that they may see something. And so they make more money by not showing anything but in the hope that they may show something, than they do by actually showing anything. Bit like gambling really. You gamble not because you win but because you almost win.

Well you know what? There is a webcam on Urquart Castle which is more exiting. And if you see 'Nessie' be sure to post here and tell us.

[Johnnyboy 22]

I watched a bit yesterday but it became boring after a while stuck in that same posistion all the time, either show us everything or not.

[emma butt]

hello its emma butt here i have just read through your replys about this subject and well what can i say. well i work on this show and i can tell you now is is live. the reason some girls dont do full frontal views of pussy is because it is up to each and every model what her limits are some of sex station models are porn stars are dont mind showing pussy full frontal no side views ect ect but some of the models are glamour only and will only do side views.now boys lets talk money, now some of you said that the show should be more explict and you should be able to here the girls conversation also more pussy shots well yes this show is internet based but it still has the same knock on effect call and get more.I personally will do most things but as you all know nothing is for free. you have a free conection to the show and its your to play with .now you can ring the girls and ask for them to do stuff that you would like to see and if if you want to hear them taking then you can phone or eves drop, the reason that your cant here the show is that no one would call in,which makes the show pointless and then whats the point it will be a free perv off for you boys so i surgest you all dig deep in your pockets and stop being so tigh, i promise you wont regert it x x