Killergram Camera Angle's

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
pj
Posts: 1647
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Killergram Camera Angle's

Post by pj »

All this moving about and zoom in and out, it distracts from the porn itself.

Pj
hammer4life
Posts: 203
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Killergram Camera Angle's

Post by hammer4life »

for the record, roobles dogging vids are usually flawless and top notch!!
PKAY
Posts: 532
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Killergram Camera Angle's

Post by PKAY »

It is quite normal to shoot stuff 'dutch' in mainstream media too - if it is used properly it can work well. If everything is on the piss it is a bit much though.

broadcast video and dvd services
The Bear up a tree
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Killergram Camera Angle's

Post by The Bear up a tree »

thank christ other people are starting to notice. i mentioned this a few months back. amateurish camera work by some one who obviously had no formal training. it show a complete lack of respect for the customer, as they think this part of the process can be handled by any fool. it needs to be address as killergram have some of the hottest girls but are doing them no favours with this type of "camera work".

it require talent and creativity to over come the challenges of shooting a sex scene, whatever the scenario. but a trained camera operator or trained director can easily do this

killergram sort it out. you are wasting some incredible girls and losing customers.

The Bear up a tree
Posts: 365
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Killergram Camera Angle's

Post by The Bear up a tree »

pagangod_uk wrote:

> The problem with KG's camerawork is not an isolated one -
> although Killergram is worse than a lot out there...
>
> Bad camerawork has been rife in 'gonzo' porn for years, mainly
> because the people who make this kind of stuff are performers
> or former performers, who think that by picking up a camcorder
> turns them into a Director - wrong!
>
> The truth of the matter is this: most people shooting porn have
> NO formal training, hence the crappy look of a lot of the
> product out there.
>
> The availability of cheap domestic camcorders means that porn
> producers can knock out, low grade, poorly-lit, badly-shot
> videos, thinking that the punters don't give a damn - well
> judging from some of the opinions here, they clearly DO give a
> damn...!
>
> It doesn't matter if you're shooting on a camcorder bought off
> the Hight St. for few hundred quid, or you're using a Broadcast
> quality HD camera that cost hundreds of thousands - if haven't
> got any real skills, it's going to show in the end product.
>
> PG.

well said, PG.

Post Reply