Having seen last weeks shows, I was eagerly awaiting more of the same this week.
Nope.
Significantly toned down. Clearly someone has had a word, although also very clearly they were not told to cut out the hard content completely. To put it in context - last weeks Lolly show had 10-15 minutes of hard girl-girl action in a 30 minute show, this week had maybe 2 minutes. It was more than camera slips, and more than on other channels, but such a disappointment when compared to the previous week.
So, have Ofcom had a word, or was it all just designed to get people subscribing by showing hard content for a couple of weeks and hoping for just a slap on the wrist from Ofcom.
Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Grawth wrote:
> So, have Ofcom had a word
Probably not yet if not cut completely. You have to remember that Ofcon say that this "causes ham to children" and everybody would be wearing two pairs if knickers and a Winceyette nightie.
Grawth wrote:
> was it all just designed to get people subscribing by showing hard content for a couple of weeks
Undoubtedly.
Ofcons remit is to protect the consumer and that should include unscrupulous business practices such as this.
> So, have Ofcom had a word
Probably not yet if not cut completely. You have to remember that Ofcon say that this "causes ham to children" and everybody would be wearing two pairs if knickers and a Winceyette nightie.
Grawth wrote:
> was it all just designed to get people subscribing by showing hard content for a couple of weeks
Undoubtedly.
Ofcons remit is to protect the consumer and that should include unscrupulous business practices such as this.
quis custodiet ipsos custodes
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Grawth wrote:
> So, have Ofcom had a word, or was it all just designed to get
> people subscribing by showing hard content for a couple of
> weeks and hoping for just a slap on the wrist from Ofcom.
Without doubt that's what happened. Peeps are getting wise to the "cum see us do ........" bollocks on forums so a flash to inspire those who still watch to gain support for the 'new' version was their next step.
More damage done but at least those who fell for the 'temptations' and made the recommendations to others will hopefully now know the reality (and had a sting in the pocket for doing it)
> So, have Ofcom had a word, or was it all just designed to get
> people subscribing by showing hard content for a couple of
> weeks and hoping for just a slap on the wrist from Ofcom.
Without doubt that's what happened. Peeps are getting wise to the "cum see us do ........" bollocks on forums so a flash to inspire those who still watch to gain support for the 'new' version was their next step.
More damage done but at least those who fell for the 'temptations' and made the recommendations to others will hopefully now know the reality (and had a sting in the pocket for doing it)
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
a sting in the pocket? what a fiver's a sting?
yes it may be soft'ish the show, but the girls can't be to blame, wouldn't the title of this thread be more appropriate if it was called 'television x' and fantasy channel dissapointment due to the fact Lolly and Antonia dont hold the cameras!!
also a fiver to see fanny lips, arse, girls snogging and obviously not gaping twats but you can still see girls finger fucking and licking each other's pussies, you just cant see insertion. But theres no way the girls could fake it due to the angle in which said finger or tongue is sliding in and out.
personally i think its a bargain. pls stop whinging about softcore channels, if you dont like, dont watch. simple as.
if you want hardcore, go spend 30 quid down your local porn shop for a dvd and then see how much that stings your pocket.
RR
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
most people who watch softcore channels are either schoolkids,blokes who aint getting no pussy or have been shagging the missus same bit of old shrivelled up kebab meat for the last 20 years.to watch 2 lovely young birds getting it on and having a handshandy for a fiver aint bad.i dont think its fair to blame the girls you should be slagging off the rip off tv channels who dont give a toss about the punters
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Why Lolly and Antonia disappointment when you should be blaming Ofcom.....Surely this has sunk in now!!!!!!!
As Renee said, its not down to us girls what you guys get to see, if you saw the show last week it was full on hardcore so you guys know that we DO really finger each other and ram those dildos in each others juicy pussys......its not our fault or down to us if the channels dont show it.......
Thanks to Davey for your post - least someone can see it for what it is.......
If you like to see girls getting it on with each other on a friday night after you'v got in from the pub then tune in next week Friday at 11 on Television X but if you gonna moan dont bother!!!
Sorry to be harsh but when you blame the girls it hurts
Antonia xxxx
As Renee said, its not down to us girls what you guys get to see, if you saw the show last week it was full on hardcore so you guys know that we DO really finger each other and ram those dildos in each others juicy pussys......its not our fault or down to us if the channels dont show it.......
Thanks to Davey for your post - least someone can see it for what it is.......
If you like to see girls getting it on with each other on a friday night after you'v got in from the pub then tune in next week Friday at 11 on Television X but if you gonna moan dont bother!!!
Sorry to be harsh but when you blame the girls it hurts
Antonia xxxx
Kisses,
Antonia xxx
Antonia xxx
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
'fanny lips', 'arse', 'gaping twats', 'finger fucking', 'insertion' and 'juicy pussies' !
Fuck the fiver .. Renee and Antonia have given you some top drawer dirty talk ... for nothing !
Fuck the fiver .. Renee and Antonia have given you some top drawer dirty talk ... for nothing !
-
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Reading the first couple of posts above I don't see anyone blaming the girls. So it seems that Ofcom instructed TVX to tone it down then. What a bunch of arseholes they are.
-
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
Hey!!! Realise this.... If they were allowed to show hardcore every night, the subscription charge would be a lot more than a fiver!
Course its not the girls fault!!!!
"Tiny black pussies always get the cream"
Re: Lolly / Antonia disappointment
ReneeRichards wrote:
>
> a sting in the pocket? what a fiver's a sting?
The money is irrelevant the rip off ISNT!
> pls stop whinging about
> softcore channels, if you dont like, dont watch. simple as.
>
I don't watch them!
This typical attitude is one of the reason why your industry is failing. Customers are getting wise to it, something I did long ago and will stop watching.
Being top totty you will always get work so I can understand why you couldn't give a fuck but the Oh well its porn so it can rip off will always have a negative affect.
>
> a sting in the pocket? what a fiver's a sting?
The money is irrelevant the rip off ISNT!
> pls stop whinging about
> softcore channels, if you dont like, dont watch. simple as.
>
I don't watch them!
This typical attitude is one of the reason why your industry is failing. Customers are getting wise to it, something I did long ago and will stop watching.
Being top totty you will always get work so I can understand why you couldn't give a fuck but the Oh well its porn so it can rip off will always have a negative affect.