RIP OFF ALERT - SportXXXBabes

[Guilbert]

Feel free to move this to O/T forum if it belongs there.

Just now and again I watch the encrypted hour on SportxxxBabes ch923 on sky between midnight and 1am.

I like watching solo girls, and in the past it has pushed the boundries for UK TV and shown a lot of fanny and dildo shots and so on.

Earlier today, just after midnight on 8th Febraury, I watched it.

Even though they were teasing a LOT before they went encrypted, after midnight it was so tame it was AWFUL. The girls even left their knickers on.
(Please no coments about "told you so", it is usually very sexy).

You could see the girls laughing as they were trying to look and behave sexy, but had obviously been told to watch their step. I assme someone has stamped down on them.

But here is the strange thing.

While flicking through the channels I saw a bit of Playboy 1 on Ch912, an unencrypted channel.

While most of this is very softcore there were quite a number of fanny shots and even a few open leg shots showing lips.

And a few weeks ago, when I was watching Playboy 1 (as I said it is unencrypted), they had a show about various female porn stars and this showed quite a few open leg shots and even fucking shots where you could see the action.

I also have to say that some of the "phone in" type shows, where the girls parade around in skimpy clothes got VERY raunchy last night about 3am, with a few of them pulling down their knickers and showing a good deal.

So how come a few unencrypted channels that anyone can see (even a 14 year old child watching TV) can show all this.

But an encrypted channel, which you have to pay for AND enter your pin, is not even allowed to show some fanny ?

In fact there was quite a bit of fanny on the Sci-Fi channel, c129, the other day when they showed the erotic adventures of the invisible man.

So at the moment DONT waste your money on SportXXXBabes Ch923 on Sky, and I assume Ch941, which is the same company, is also as bad (in fact someone did mention this on this forum a few days ago).

I say again, no comments about "told you so". I watch a lot of porn on internet, DVD, and so on so fully aware of the UK TV restrictions, I just happen to find the girls on Ch923 usually very sexy.

[untold]

I've got a cable box that lets me watch any channel I want and as far as I'm concerned all softporn channels are a waste of space. Why people want to pay money to see the back of some girls head is beyond me.

[Welshman]

I understand totally why you'd tune in (with babes like Harmony, Avalon and Angel Long who wouldn't?!) but these channels are a rip off. Trouble is the first time you find out is usually when you've just parted with your cash (as I did). I've heard of channels like this being taken off the air in the past so if they were pushing the boundaries maybe they've been warned by the authorities? I'll be sticking to the freeviews from now on.

[Scaramanga]

I've tuned in a few times (well aware of warnings, etc) but you come in from the pub and well...you know. !hic!

But i tuned in last night and it was nothing short of a disgrace. That channel has gone from seeing a lot of dildo insertion (avalon in the old days rings a bell), hardcore with pervcam (the delightful faye rampton), a fair bit of squirting, down to the standard held open pussy shots and s/c camera angles and now finally this...I mean, I know it's cold at the moment, but this is extreme.

Suppose they'll all be in polar necks, swapping stories and roasting marshmallows tonight. !wink!

Never again. !rant!

[Johnnyboy 22]

Every channel from Ch 906 all the way to Ch 923 is softcore, why people pay for it is beyond me, i get all my porn from the net, and that does me fine. I occasionally watch the channels and thats it. Hey Guilbert you watch that remote, youll wear it out mate.

[untold]

As I don't have to pay for these channels I do tune in from time to time but onlu to find out if there are any new girls I like. I'd never have heard or Natalie Heck or Karla Romano if I hadn't seen the shite versions of their films on these channels.

[Josephine]

hi
Just want to add that depite the fact that i was available for 6hrs to work i didnt get my full days pay and this stinks no other company would expect a girl to sit around all day waiting to work and then when we have other commitments and we have to go as its getting late they moan at us.This is all im saying in this matter
jj

[harmonyluvver]

Well I imagine that the self appointed guardians of british adult television will have taken it upon themselves to inform Ofcon of these breaches of the code by playboy so I wouldn't expect to see them for much longer. I will stick to the net and DVD's for my porn but I will still watch sport to see the hot girls on there. I will also still phone in occasionally because I dont generally get the chance to chat with Angel Long, Harmony Hex and Crystel lei.

[BobB]

> Well I imagine that the self appointed guardians of british adult television will have taken it upon themselves to inform Ofcon of these breaches of the code by playboy so I wouldn't expect to see them for much longer.

It's up to the likes of Playboy etc to challenge the code then!
I would imagine that everyone on this forum would like the opportunity of watching harder material on British Satellite TV than is currently broadcast. The broadcasters have been taking cash off the viewers under false pretences for years, by promising "XXX hardcore action after encryption" etc. Time for them to take action.

[Jacques]

I do believe that ofcon are looking at all adult broadcasters at the moment including the claims made about content and the text/call in channels in a similar vein to the current crop of "quiz" channels.

It is going to stay "soft" for a while yet and my prediction is fines all round and at least one channel to have its license revoked.

Fuck 'em, they deserve everything they get.