Virtual Sex With Angel Long

This forum is intended for the discussion and sharing of information on the topic of British born and British-based female performers in hard-core adult films and related matters.
stewick
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by stewick »

I have got to say that any fans of angel long/dirty talk would have to get hold of the uncut version of this. She really does go for gold in it. Its also easy to see why the BBFC would be acting the way they are. She makes comments about paying her for sex which is one of their pet pevs I believe. She has got a mouth on her that would put even a hardened chav to shame!
MJ
Posts: 58
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by MJ »

That is correct Stewick, she talks so much that we had to cut the entire
nice part of the dvd and that's almost 80 minutes of material!

So you can understand we didn't want to do that!

Cheers,

Martijn.

Pleasureplaza
neil
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by neil »

And i thought jeanna fine and alicia rhodes had the filthiest mouths ?

L stacey
Easter Egg
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by Easter Egg »

It is not a matter of filth, (the slut part is actually loaded with that stuff) it is because of the scenes where she is wearing a school uniform (being a "dirty little schoolgirl") and begging the "headmaster" (a.k.a you the viewer) to give her a real hard time. The BBFC considers this generally as "any reference to a sexual relationship between a minor and an adult". And they are pretty allergic to that kinda stuff.
I remember a cut that had to made made, where a 40 year old big fat transsexual guy dressed in a tutu referred to his SM-master as "daddy".
That was a no-go either according to the BBFC. Even a moron could see easily that this "girl" was old enough to be a daddy himself, with no tits and a hairy breast. But The BBFC wants to protect your innocent souls at any costs.
Easter Egg
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by Easter Egg »

In earlier posts I already mentioned the inconsistencies of the BBFC policy before.
We also have approved versions of British spanking movies with head masters whipping innocent schoolgirls.
The BBFC is just something we have to live with. But we make films the way WE want, and not to please the BBFC solely. If they don't approve our movies, too bad.
Jock
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by Jock »

Then why did you cut it?
Why not challenge the BBFC for their censorship? That is the only way that the BBFC will change, otherwise we will have to suffer continuing, and unjustifiable IMO, censorship.

Personally, I hope that anyone who buys the R18 version is fully aware of the extreme censorship it has suffered, rather than being fooled into, probably, paying more, for an inferior product.
rednose
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Post by rednose »

Just had my copy of the DVD delivered.

The only other interactive DVD I have is Tera Patrick, this is 10 times better.

I was a little disappointed at the lack of Money Shots (e.g it's on the Bonus disk). But at least it is more realistic than the fake ones in the Tera DVD.

I can see how you are going to have problems with the BBFC.

But it's pure quality!

I disagree with Angel's comments in the Interview on the disk, her British produced stuff is way better than the stuff I have seen from the States

Rednose

Post Reply