Not Michelle Barrett as well?!

[Pianaman]

Oh my god! Michelle had some of the loveliest breasts - why would anyone ruin their looks this way? It often seems to be when girls start to try and break into the US market - have they no idea at all what feminine beauty and sexuality is over there? - its all "bigger is better" - pillocks.

[George]

I think we need to do a survey to find the nation's best breasts, and then put a preservation order on them. Any volunteers?

Perhaps at the same time we could do a census of the nation's cosmetic surgeons, and put an eradication order on them.

And JJ, if you thought Rachel's breasts were improved by her op, you have more in common with the blessed Blunkett than you realised.

[jj]

Come the Revolution, after we've put the lawyers up against the wall [Legal notice- only joking.......], let's follow straight after with cosmetic surgeons/US porn producers/magazine editors who push surgery as a way to 'beauty'.

[George]

jj wrote:

> Come the Revolution, after we've put the lawyers up against the
> wall [Legal notice- only joking.......], let's follow straight
> after with cosmetic surgeons/US porn producers/magazine editors
> who push surgery as a way to 'beauty'.

Hear, hear!

[Rude Boy]

"let's follow straight after with cosmetic surgeons/US porn producers/magazine editors who push surgery as a way to 'beauty'."

From my own experience it would appear that most adult magazine editors are very anti fake tits and prefer to run models with natural tits as much as possible. In fact I don't know anyone who is pro silicone, certainly the public seem to hate them.

I'm a bit puzzled as to why there appears to have been no obvious progress in this form of surgery, I've seen recent boob jobs that are truly hideous despite costing a few grand. It's that awful "Half a Grapefruit" shape that gets me and the worst offenders also have a gap inbetween as wide as the M11.

The best cosmetic surgeon is still God!

Amen.

[sandie]

i dont believe its down to producers/photographers or the like making girls feel unconfident.
My belief is that its more peer pressure from other models.

I hear very few people making porn comment on tits these days (ok, maybe to say what a shit boob job) and from a models POV ive never had any producers/photographers suggest i change mine.

[jj]

Rude Boy wrote:
> From my own experience it would appear that most adult magazine
> editors are very anti fake tits
My criticism was directed more against mainstream mags, which push a certain narrow view of 'beauty', in collusion, I believe, with vested interests such as the fashion industry. Look at the hoo-ha till Sophie Dahl was 'accepted'- and look at how she ended up, as empty-headed arm-candy.
> I'm a bit puzzled as to why there appears to have been no obvious
> progress in this form of surgery
May be related to the materials point I raised above.
> The best cosmetic surgeon is still God!
How do you explain George Formby, then?
Shalom.

[vila]

Oh . . . my . . . God!

I am totally devastated. I was recently compiling a 'top tits' list for a possible forum post and Michelle would probably have been in the top three, certainly the top five. Now she doesn't even merit consideration.

This subject literally brings tears to my eyes. I feel so desperately sad that so many girls are so unhappy with themselves that they take such extreme measures.

And I think it is actually the girls themselves who are responsible, not agents, promoters, editors, publishers, photographers etc. A few months back I watched a TV documentary which followed a would-be model on her campaign to break into the industry. From the start she was adamant that she wanted a boob job, despite having a most wonderful pair of natural breasts. She was repeatedly told by everyone concerned that there was nothing wrong and that any attempt to interfere with Nature stood an odds on chance of disaster. Agents, photographers, editors, even plastic surgeons who do this sort of work, for goodness' sake, all said the same thing - "don't try to fix what ain't broke". Nevertheless, she went on and on and on and on, trying to find somebody who would agree with her and recommend and/or carry out the surgery. I think it is beyond doubt that there is an illness of some kind at work here.

The number of girls who have had enhancements and look as good afterwards, never mind better, can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And here I have to disagree about Bev Cocks. She's a lovely girl, but the 'before' was better. On the other hand, nobody has mentioned Layla-Jade and I have to repeat my opinion that hers is the best boob job I've ever seen. I think I still prefer her original much more 'innocent girl next door' look (if you can possibly imagine L-J as innocent!), but to look at her now you wouldn't know she's had the op without being told.

But back to Michelle: I am now in a quandary. I was pleased to see her many recent posts about her new b/g work and was looking forward to buying a few, but I'll have to spend a lot of time ensuring I get the work she did before the op. Even that will be tainted with knowledge of what's happened, but I sure as hell don't want to get lumbered with any post-op stuff.

It's all very sad.

P.S. Nobody has yet confirmed the Sammy-Jayne op - I'm still praying . . .

P.P.S. Nor the bizarre claim made recently on this forum that she's retired!

[colin]

please never do sandie, you're gorgeous as you are!

[jj]

Layla's another case in point, yes.