egafd.com

bigAl wrote:
>
> porngirlsxrated - If you'd have bothered to read on, you would
> have seen my later response.
>
>

I did bother to read on and I did read your later response

bigAl wrote: > I quote from an earlier post on a similar subject: > > Every "Employer" is required by law to comply with Health and > Safety legislation, which means (1) providing a "safe place of > work", and (2) supplying "appropriate protective equipment to > guard against any known risk of ...

Sam Slater wrote: > You said you don't know JayK, but you do seem to know a little > about his motivations etc.... > > However my points still stand, and are open for sarcasm, abuse > or serious debate. That's for the individual to to decide for > themselves. > > At least I can claim to be at least ...

Sam Slater wrote: > Firstly I'll be a good Samaritan and say: "You're doing it > again!" > > Sorry; just had to warn you, seeing as you exclaimed, 'you'd > been dragged into an argument' last time. > > Do I rub you up the wrong way? Like I said before, 'the paper > trail isn't so hard to follow ...

Hi Isabel Very sorry to hear you have become the target of a vicious rumour You are a well loved, successful and established performer and nobody of any note in this industry would believe such libellous rumours Hopefully the witch hunts will end soon Hope you feeling better soon and decide to stay ...

Sam Slater wrote: > [img]http://www.parida.com/img1/head-in-sand.jpg[/img] > > Just a bit of humour to lighten the mood..........waddaya say? > > Hi Sam One of your key proposals is for studios/directors not to hire porn stars who also escort (please correct me if this is wrong) Please could you ...

Sam Slater wrote: > And don't be too sure of yourself about me just being > 'just a surfer'. > > Since these discussions started, I've had quite a few e-mails > backing me up, but pointing out I'm wasting my time. Two > performers I know feel particularly grieved that fellow > performers would put ...

Sam Slater wrote: > Did I say I had the solution? Read my post again. I said I was > at least 'trying to minimise a problem' , while you > didn't even try that. You were just critical of me because my > opinion wasn't suitable to you. > > A name & shame site, could only ever be 'reactive' at it's ...

Sam Slater wrote: > > However, I at least was thinking progressively from what > experience of STD's I have, and trying to minimise a problem. > Where's your solution before criticising me? > > You can have all the free testing centres and silly 'name & > shame' websites you want, but they'll do ...

Sam Slater wrote: > No one is against escorts. I believe it should be fully > legalised. > > My point is the mixing of the two professions which increases > risk. We want to decrease risk, not increase it. > > There's no personal crusade against escorts. Not from me > anyway.... > > Sam I am not ...