attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 7:38 am
please read section 2.1.1 of the faq.
Page 1 of 2
Re: attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:15 am
Errr... was this directed at me??? I'm gonna have to get myself a more unique name... Any suggestions?
Re: attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:44 am
It was directed at a different John.
Re: attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:55 am
I didn't think I'd crossed any lines!!! Maybe board registation would be an idea, i.e. so that we all had unique names??
Re: attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:58 am
People should look at the names currently in use by the regulars before posting.
Re: attn: john
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:00 am
what about a online indicator?
Shaun
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 11:18 am
Shaun... the question is, when is a regular a regular... I've been posting here for over a year, but looking in longer than that... now I have used the name John in all of that time - but others have come and gone too... I can't therefore stake a claim to John, but at the same time neither do I wish to change the name I use as one or two MAY link the name "John" with my previous posts... does that make sense???
Guess I should just opt for something unique...
Guess I should just opt for something unique...
Re: Shaun
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:10 pm
prehaps put your initial after it, or call yourself fyrfyter as in your e-mail name.
I nearly chose Tremendous Mushroom...
I nearly chose Tremendous Mushroom...
Re: Shaun
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 1:43 pm
Everyone would have thought you were Ben Dover.
Re: Shaun
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:03 pm
...using similar logic, I might assume you were Ruud Gullit..... 
)
)