Page 1 of 1
privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 11:52 am
by crofter
no I have not had too much of the nations favourite dram before anybody asks, so does anybody, have any more details about Privates First video shot in Scotland: ?The Scottish Loveknot?, sounds like a phil mcavity award winner to me, any info Phil?? Would have thought this would have been big news in Scotland.
crofter
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 2:56 pm
by Jim K
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:10 pm
by jj
......an Aussie leading lady: priceless.
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 5:36 pm
by Dave Wells
Yeah it's true, shot late last year by a new director who we met down in Cannes 2000 whilst we were shooting for Private. He was in Cannes working for Channel 5 I think.
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 6:57 pm
by crofter
yes an aussie lead again, but surely must be better than Mel bloody Gibson in Braveheart, interesting to see if any of the British based stars had a go at a highland accent.
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 7:01 pm
by Goater
Stars Jodi Moore i'm sure and it's going to or has just been sequeled. Was a special on it in a recent Private update.
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 7:26 pm
by crofter
look forward to this and hopefully the sequel as could be quite a bit of british female talent as well, one more news article if anybody interested:
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 7:34 pm
by crofter
also is that sadie leach on the left of the picture with the 4 girls, could be Michelle Barratt though??
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 8:14 pm
by Bayleaf
Well the text does list a "Michelle B" as a British Native, a clue perhaps?
Bloody fine eyesight though crofter.
BTW will this have an R18?
Re: privates new scottish video
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2003 8:43 pm
by vila
You were shooting in SCOTLAND while the DIRECTOR was in CANNES?????
Er . . . . . excuse me?