egafd.com

Actually, look at her. She is in fact looking like a sad loser. A proud young woman made to jump through some hoops for the sake of tissue killing.

But at least it's a healthy distraction from Rio Lee's boring posts!

[img]http://www.petgirls.com/img/preview_130309.jpg[/img]

What's healthy about putting women in a demeaning pose? Pathetic.

They dont have to do it.
Infact most that do I am suprised they do as most have the "my shit doesnt stink" attitude normaly.

It's a fetish, not for everyone but popular. It's certainly not demeaning shooting it.

I am quite sure some of them do it because it turns them on. Just because it is wrong to treat someone like shit against their will doesn't mean it stops being a sexy and healthy fetish for those that enjoy the kink.

He's not treating anyone like shit in the photos, obviously it's staged and a fetish.

This one is a bit dull and uninspired compared to some you have done in the past though, shame as Kiki is a good looking model and deserves better than you just going through the motions Simon

Its the sort of set up that fuels the fires of those who want to ban all porn, not just the rampant blue rinse and feminist brigades, and there are plenty of moves afoot at present.

Fine if that's your thing but the visual impact is that the woman is in a very demeaning role - and you could say the same for ball busting when it comes to men - and availability on a free site doesn't help the cause of keeping porn, especially "main stream" porn, from being pushed back into the dark ages.

So you are proposing censorship to avoid censorship?!

I dont normally come up on here to defend Bensonmedia but I've never attacked him for what he does as i fully accept that girls do what they do because they want to do it. You either get fetish or you dont. if you dont like it, move on down the queue until you do find something you like

As Maisie said, there are things that are so wrong but feel so right because they are wrong thats the screwed up thing about us as human beings expressing ourselves sexually. Ive always thought porn was the last line of freedom because it does what it wants to without giving a shit what people think about it.

Its just balls to the wind out there. Whatever it is

It all comes down to you not liking it which panders dangerously to censorship which is ultimately what the anti porn lot want. porn doesnt have to be responsible to what people like but its advisable to not push the boundaries too far as it openly asks for trouble. We know what we're talking about here.

I find some porn very objectionable but Ive never foisted my opinion on whether it was wrong or right as long as its between legally consenting individuals then its no one elses business but them and those who buy into it

I think BensonMedia has his place in playing field as much as any other

We can agree to disagree on everything else though !happy!

I'm not proposing censorship to help oppose censorship, nor am I saying that people shouldn't be allowed to indulge in consensual acts that work for them.

What I'm trying to get across is that a vast majority of the population looking at that and similar images would find it far from healthy, would find it demeaning and to publish such images on an open site adds fuel to the fire being stoked by the ban it brigade.

If "main stream" porn i.e solo pics/vids, b/g, g/g is to survive as available to all (given one eyed jack's comments on pirating of porn I will avoid the phrasely "freely available") then perhaps fetish porn may have to be restricted to paysites because, make no mistake, if the industry doesn't differentiate, the ban it brigade certainly won't and blanket restrictions are in none of our interests.