egafd.com

alright, who wants to sniff the saddle? me first...

[img]http://blowjobworld.net/0320-02/001/big ... it_763.jpg[/img]

I had a professor in college and I asked him "if you look at the world that men have created, does it seem remotely heterosexual to you?"

I asked him when you look at the double-standard that "men" have created that says a woman's chest is pornographic and a crime to be seen in public, while a man's chest is wonderful and great, does this seem to be a stance of a gay man or a straight man?

He replied that there is NO way that a hetero man would ever pass the laws of mainstream society. A straight man likes the female chest and would pass no laws or restriction on them.

He said that even as a bisexual man himself, the level of queerness in mainstream society even offends him. He said that he would bet his bottom dollar that 95% of men in society were flaming queers. The extreme love that men have of watching other men prance around half naked (sumo, boxing, wrestling, Baywatch, beach, regular tv, in public, ad nauseum), compared to the fear and hysteria surrounding the female body is the stance of a hard-boiled queer.

He said that men try to hide behind religion, but there is no line in the bible which states men's chests are great, while a woman's is dirty. The double-standard against the female body comes from the queers who run society, not religion or "morals."

is it possible to go with men and women from time to time and not be bisexual or gay ive asked my girlfriend and she says she dont know.

I think the definition of bisexual IS going from one sex to another.

I thought about having a go at this ludicrous post but there were just too many ways to do it as the poster clearly has no knowledge at all of law, politics, sociology, psychology or religion. To engage in any sort of debate with such a twisted bigot is to give unwarranted credence to his mindless gibbering.

Hopefully whole thing will be removed anyway as it is off-topic bilge.

Thanks for not wasting my time.

No, the restriction on exposure of womens' breasts is 'only I may see my woman's breasts'.
Possessvieness, not homosexuality, religion or quantum physics.

You, you... have a point. Unlike "Spook", who calls me a bigot for QUOTING a BISEXUAL man , whom I would not have befriended if I was a "bigot", you actually have an intelligent point to make.

I asked my prof. what HE thought about society. I have always felt that there is a huge queerness about how women's bodies are treated in society, and I wanted to know if others felt the same. He used the words "FLAMING QUEERS". And I happen to agree.

This whole thing is "on topic" because the whole topic is about pics on a site called blowjobworld.net/0320/001/big_natural_tit_763.jpg

How can talking about society's fear of the breast be off-topic when the topic is tits in the first place? Only the "spook" knows. Hope to hell he honors his word and doesn't come back.

JJ, you say it's a man's desire to possess a woman that is behind society's restrictions on the female body. How does that explain that in Europe and tribal societies you find absolutely little if any of this same possessiveness? In tribal societies men are just as domineering if not more than in regular societies. Why are Europeans less afraid of women's breasts being seen? I lived in Europe for 2 years, they are a completely different species than Americans on the topic of human sexuality on the whole.

In Brazil, men are accused of being extremely possessive of women, even willing to kill them if they are SUSPECTED of cheating. Yet Brazilian men are nowhere near as controlling as far as how much flesh a woman can show on tv and in public as others are.

This does not seem to be about mere control to me, though it may be a part of it. What do women get out of this double-standard? I hear no complaints from them at all. If mere possession was the cause of this double-standard, I believe women would rebel against it. I believe women don't rebel because they know it is not about mere possession, it is about an honest fear of/ distaste for the female body. When women are arrested for topless behavior, they are arrested on "obscenity" charges. When people call a woman's chest obscene that does not sound like possession to me, it sounds like a queer hatred of the female body.

If only men voted, I could see women being held down and kept as chattel: forbidden to own property, kept from any real power. But in this world, women vote and tear down signs of male patriarchal domination. It seems strange that while women attack male dominance in the workforce, they tolerate the dominance of the male body in film, art, tv, public, etc. It's as if women have internalized the "male" cocept that their bodies are dirty and sinful, while men's bodies are pure and good and should be exposed at every possible opportunity. A gay man's wish and dream.

'topless behavior' - how can you have topless behaviour - can you have 'short hair' behaviour? Dear madam, I don't like your topless behaviour.

i believe its called snurging the saddle and a jolly nice pastime it is as well