Page 1 of 2

attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 10:46 am
by sandie caine
sorry to abuse the forum like this but if its all i can do to get my own content back than im prepaired to take an ear bashing from alex,phil or woody.


GREGOR... i have called u, mailed u, had the people that put me in contact with u mail and call u. im told that this may be the only way to get hold of u!!!!
I want my content. i dont want this to get nasty either but im not being done over.
do not post it without contacting me first please.

sandiexxx

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 11:05 am
by Shaun?
I think in the circumstances the mods should be sympathetic towards Sandie.

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 11:51 am
by Crimpo
Agreed Shaun - and it also serves a purpose.

If 'producers'/'photographers' don't play fair then people have a right to a fair warning There was an even worse example (basically physical assault) mentioned here and elsewhere recently - a bit of naming and shaming wouldn't have gone amiss there either...

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:28 pm
by Officer Dibble
I agree. Anyone who breaks their word (a verbal contract) be they models, producers, photographers or whatever, should be named and shamed. It's so difficult earning an adult video crust these days that you've got enough on your plate without idiots twating you about.

Dibble

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:35 pm
by John Mason
FUCKING HELL!!!! First time I've ever agreed with Dibble!
Oh, I feel faint!

Re: Diabolical Liberties

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:46 pm
by Ace
We are all in agreement here. How some ponce can stitch someone like Sandie up is a real nosher. He should be 'blacklisted' and other models made aware of Gregors unsavoury side. Name-calling and threats get your posts deleted, but its something I feel strongly about.

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 2:51 pm
by jj
Me too.

Re: attn; gregor

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2003 3:14 pm
by WessexXXX.tv
I'm on-side with this one as well.

Chris

Gregor's reply

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 5:18 am
by Rabc
so it seems that because I have been having a few probs getting some tapes to Sandie I am being pilloried, the tapes are actually all wrapped up, waiting to be posted but as I am aware, the address I have for Sandie is not her current address!!!

Sandie you know my e-mail addy, as soon as I have recieved you8r current address the tapes will be in the post.

Gregor

Re: Gregor's reply

Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2003 9:05 am
by Crimpo
Well I'll confess to pillorying Gregor without giving him the chance to answer - am very pleased if there was no real problem.

I am happy to retain my view that the activities of some unscrupulous operators should be publicised (for obvious reasons)

I am delighted if Sandie now regains her property and in those circumstances to unequivocably apologise to RabC/Gregor

I'm sending this by e-mail to RabC as well

Crimpo