Page 1 of 2
Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:59 pm
by Paul L
I was looking through some of last weeks shoots and saw this pic of new model Natalia, and thought, wow, this was very sexy, so it goes to show that fully clothed can be just as sexy imho.
[img]
http://www.onlytease.com/images/temp/natalia.jpg[/img]
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:23 pm
by Pervert
Explicit doesn't equate to erotic. That is a fantastic photo, and no naughty bits on show. Well done---and Natalia looks a stunner.
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:03 pm
by Mate
Yeah, you have right man. I like this photo.
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:36 pm
by Chris Rocks
That is a hot pic!
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:23 pm
by one eyed jack
Woo-haaa! That is sexy.
Nice one.
Re: ....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 5:42 pm
by pj
Set up a website then with her fully clothed and see how much money u make.
Zilch.
She does look hot, but I want her naked not clothed.
Pj
Re: ....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 6:08 pm
by Paul L
Well we did take that idea as a basis for onlytease - started 6 years ago and still going, so believe me there is a huge market for tease / clothed etc
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:47 pm
by bristolian
I agree- v.g. Compare it with the one with Rebecca Smythe and her innards on show. No comparison.
Re: Sexy doesn't have to be nude .....
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:08 pm
by LuxuryYacht
Natalia X looks hotter naked. And with her innards on show!
