egafd.com

There is an idiot pretending to be an American pornographer, offering big money.

I would post the details on here but I'm sure that it would just be delted.

Guidelines on naming and shaming.

Jacques wrote:

>
>
> Guidelines on naming and shaming.
>
>

You know my only concern is to give some information out so that some female performer doesn't get fucked over.

And if someone does get shafted because a "fan" owned and operated forum, won't allow me to post the information because they are worried about the remote possiblity of a liable case.
(Like a judge would ever listen to a liable case between pornographers. )

Then it isn't my fault and I tried.

Why not do what the FAQ suggests?

Mart

mart wrote:

> Why not do what the FAQ suggests?
>
> Mart

Because
1) I don't believe pirated DVDs support terrorism.
2) Nor, that I honestly need an extra fuse and a switch on my electric outlets.

But mostly because I'm going to tell the whole entire story.. Every last single detail and even make the chat conversations and emails public.

And if someone ever wanted to sue me...
Then that's their right and I'm more than happy to go to court!

> But mostly because I'm going to tell the whole entire story.. Every last single > > detail and even make the chat conversations and emails public.

> And if someone ever wanted to sue me...
> Then that's their right and I'm more than happy to go to court!


Going to post it on your own website?

Kelly,

I have never met you, nor, from your posts do I want to.

I would only say that based on your various posts since you discovered this site, that your command of the vitriol is almost absolute.

Your constant, stated zero opinion of the UK porn industry has been noted.
I would suggest that you return to the countries you consider "pro" in the industry and leave us poor peasants to fend for ourselves in this wicked world.

In the event that you decide to remain here and continue to post, I suggest that you confine your remarks/intentions to earning money in the way that you STATE you can and leave alone EVERYONE else to do their own thing.

As is well known, I have no ulterior motive, BUT I feel that you do.
When you can make a product available from your own resources - either as star/producer or whatever, that stacks up and proves your acidc point, THEN you will have the statistics to prove your comments/observations.

Until that time, I would suggest that you carry on producing your own stuff and leave the rest of the UK industry do do its own thing.

But do you understand her response to my suggestion?

Mart

Brother Blue wrote:

> I can understand why Ms Steele may be disliked on here after
> reading some of her previous posts, but in this case shouldn?t
> she be given the benefit of the doubt?
>
> After all, the women she?s warning are UK female performers.
>
> Maybe she?s trying to mend a few bridges?
>
> Best wishes
>
> Brother Blue
> http://www.brothersblue.com
> http://www.rudehousewives.com
> enquiry@brothersblue.com
> ICQ Brother Blue 74-105-185
> MSN brothersblue@hotmail.co.uk

Brother Blue,
I have no complaints with you. So don't think I'm taking a shot at ya.

I'll post it on my own sites, publish it in a newspaper, etc. I'm not afraid of anything.
I just don't understand this overdone ASS-kissing that everyone seems to expect. When it comes to ass-kissing I will do it literally for a paycheck, but never proverbially.

As for mending bridges, I am not sure what you are talking about. I am just warning girls that this guy has contacted me and that his story does NOT check out, so be warned.